Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Daniel Ellsberg: The Next War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 09:44 AM
Original message
Daniel Ellsberg: The Next War
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/510

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by Daniel Ellsberg

A hidden crisis is under way. Many government insiders are aware of serious plans for war with Iran, but Congress and the public remain largely in the dark. The current situation is very like that of 1964, the year preceding our overt, open-ended escalation of the Vietnam War, and 2002, the year leading up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

In both cases, if one or more conscientious insiders had closed the information gap with unauthorized disclosures to the public, a disastrous war might have been averted entirely.

My own failure to act, in time, to that effect in 1964 was pointed out to me by Wayne Morse thirty-five years ago. Morse had been one of only two U.S. senators to vote against the Tonkin Gulf resolution on August 7, 1964. He had believed, correctly, that President Lyndon Johnson would treat the resolution as a congressional declaration of war. His colleagues, however, accepted White House assurances that the president sought "no wider war" and had no intention of expanding hostilities without further consulting them. They believed that they were simply expressing bipartisan support for U.S. air attacks on North Vietnam three days earlier, which the president and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara had told them were in "retaliation" for the "unequivocal," "unprovoked" attack by North Vietnamese torpedo boats on U.S. destroyers "on routine patrol" in "international waters."

Each of the assurances above had been false, a conscious lie. That they were lies, though, had only been revealed to the public seven years later with the publication of the Pentagon Papers, several thousand pages of top-secret documents on U.S. decision-making in Vietnam that I had released to the press. The very first installment, published by The New York Times on June 13, 1971, had proven the official account of the Tonkin Gulf episode to be a deliberate deception.

When we met in September, Morse had just heard me mention to an audience that all of that evidence of fraud had been in my own Pentagon safe at the time of the Tonkin Gulf vote. (By coincidence, I had started work as a special assistant to an assistant secretary of defense the day of the alleged attack -- which had not, in fact, occurred at all.) After my talk, Morse, who had been a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1964, said to me, "If you had given those documents to me at the time, the Tonkin Gulf resolution would never have gotten out of committee. And if it had somehow been brought up on the floor of the Senate for a vote, it would never have passed."

He was telling me, it seemed, that it had been in my power, seven years earlier, to avert the deaths so far of 50,000 Americans and millions of Vietnamese, with many more to come. It was not something I was eager to hear. After all, I had just been indicted on what eventually were twelve federal felony counts, with a possible sentence of 115 years in prison, for releasing the Pentagon Papers to the public. I had consciously accepted that prospect in some small hope of shortening the war. Morse was saying that I had missed a real opportunity to prevent the war altogether....Years later, though, the thought hit me: What if I had told Congress and the public, later in the fall of 1964, the whole truth about what was coming, with all the documents I had acquired in my job by September, October, or November? Not just, as Morse had suggested, the contents of a few files on the events surrounding the Tonkin Gulf incident -- all that I had in early August -- but the drawerfuls of critical working papers, memos, estimates, and detailed escalation options revealing the evolving plans of the Johnson Administration for a wider war, expected to commence soon after the election. In short, what if I had put out before the end of the year, whether before or after the November election, all of the classified papers from that period that I did eventually disclose in 1971?
......
I would have been indicted then, as I was seven years later, and probably imprisoned. But America would have been at peace during those years. It was only with that reflection, perhaps a decade after the carnage finally ended, that I recognized Morse had been right about my personal share of responsibility for the whole war.



A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION

Daniel Ellsberg, a former official in the State and Defense departments who released the Pentagon Papers, is the author of Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers.

This originally appeared in Harpers.




I DON'T THINK ELLSBERG SHOULD BEAT HIMSELF UP TOO MUCH---IT'S STILL UNLIKELY THAT EVEN IF 100 OF THOSE IN THE KNOW HAD SPOKEN OUT, VIETNAM COULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED COLD. LOOK AT HOW MANY SPOKE OUT BEFORE IRAQ--MANY OF THEM IN THE KNOW, OTHERS JUST SMARTER FROM THE LESSONS OF VIETNAM--AND STILL POWERLESS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. People are speaking out now. They have been for a long time.
Retired generals, veteran intelligence professionals, lots of folks. The war has been churning along on its merry path to disaster anyway. I don't think Ellsberg would have made a difference in 1964 because the country wasn't ready to hear him. He did make a difference later because the Pentagon Papers appeared at the right time to add more fuel to the flame of antiwar sentiment that was then finally engulfing the nation.

I mean no disrespect for Ellsberg in saying this, but for him to think he could have ended Vietnam in 1964 is to engage in what I might call delusions of personal significance. It is natural and perhaps inescapable for him to have thoughts like this, but they are not realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cautiouslywaiting Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think you're right.
So many of us tried to speak up about Iraq and it got us nowhere. I hope people will listen this time, about Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-27-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Keep this one alive, folks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-28-06 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. The crucial difference between then and now:
The media.
Sure, plenty of people have spoken out.
The media has decidedly silenced them.
Given that the media is now controlled by those who
profit most from war and madness, I see no end in sight
to either.
R.I.P. America and never forget the complicity of
the bubble headed talking heads in our collective demise.
May history one day reveal their treason against us.


BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC