Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Nation: It's Over for Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 11:33 PM
Original message
The Nation: It's Over for Bush
It's Over for Bush

The year 2006 will long be remembered as the Great Retribution--or perhaps the Deliverance Election. George W. Bush's presidency is toast. Bush's potential to further harm the Republic has been greatly reduced. Most Americans stopped believing anything he said a good while back. This was their opportunity to tell him to his face. And they did, with such force and breadth that maybe even he and his cronies heard them.

Much credit goes to the voters and the Democratic Party. Not many off-year elections move history in a fundamental way, but this one did. Americans have elected an opposition that can now check the Administration's destructive policies and investigate its actions at home and abroad, while at the same time putting forth policies that begin to reverse the damage of the past six years. African-American and Latino voters were crucial to the Democratic victory, with a significantly higher percentage of Latinos than in the last midterms voting against the Bush agenda.

The losers, starting with Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, who resigned immediately, deserve no sympathy. They have "ruled"--not governed--with cold arrogance and a frightening willingness to ignore the law, including the Constitution. Their Republican legions marched along in lock step, collecting boodle for themselves as they went.

By expressing their disgust, voters have made three great gains. It's true these gains are not yet fully secure. Bush still holds power. The Senate results are not yet settled. But power relationships in Washington have been utterly altered.

The first is the repudiation of Bush and his corrupt presidency, in which everything was for sale, and scandals--corporate and personal--became commonplace. Bush is now naked in his weakness. In some ways this could make him more dangerous in the two years ahead, but Democrats have the power to stop his outrages and excesses. There will be talk of "bipartisanship," as there is after every election. But this fight is not over, and there is no room for compromise with boneheaded intransigence.

The second is the antiwar victory. Candidates of all types ran against the war and won everywhere, demolishing blue state- red state stereotypes on this great issue. Americans want out of this disastrous war--now, as soon as possible. Bush will no doubt hold out for a fig leaf to cover his decisions. But Democrats must not forget the voters' message. If they collaborate in allowing continued bloodletting in Iraq, they will pay the price themselves in future elections.

The rest is at: http://www.thenation.com/doc/20061127/editors



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. He left his mark on the Supreme Court. 30 years or more.
Hey, Ralph. That ok with you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Hey Sandra Day O'Connor! You proud of what you've done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrictlyRockers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Actually, I think she sounds rather regretful about it.
I don't think she's proud at all. And neither should she be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I agree, on both points. I ready recently where she expressed concern
at the attack on an independent Judiciary. As I picked up my jaw, I wondered, "Well Sandra, how's that Selection 2000 ruling working out for you, huh?' Talk about the ultimate assault on an independent Judiciary. The felonious five were wrong to stop the counting and allow bush* to be installed as pResident over the wishes of the people. And make no mistake, ANY WAY YOU SHAKE IT, BAKE IT OR COUNT IT, AL GORE WON.

Yes, not quite the ending of a legal legacy for the first woman to sit on the Supreme Court I would have chosen. "hmmmm...let's see, I can go out as a standard bearer for justice and equality for all, or I can be remembered as a partisan hack...which should I choose?"

Unfortunately, she chose poorly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush's belligerence and the terrorist card...
will allow him to continue to do much without proper vigilance and proper opposition.

Today, they passed a terrorism bill that reclassifies animal rights activist activities as terrorist offenses. The bill was passed by unanimous consent in the Senate and the non-transparent voice vote in the House. Bush will obviously sign it, and another corner is ripped off of the Constitution.

I am a scientist. I cannot stand PETA and their ilk, but these new laws are ridiculous and set dangerous precedents. This nightmare is not over.

But in the meantime:



And lets mix a healthy dose of vigilance and oppsition with our celebration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. So, where is the word "impeach" ? Or "impeachment"?
Edited on Tue Nov-14-06 06:10 AM by pat_k
.. .Bush's potential to further harm the Republic has been greatly reduced. . .

How many times do Bush and Cheney and their minions have to prove they will stop at nothing before the folks who claim to reside in the "reality-based community" Get It??

The Constituiton is in breach.

The criminal enterprise headquarted in the WH continues. They are torturing the Constitution and committing War Crimes in plain sight.

Bush's potential to harm our constitutional democracy hasn't even been dented.

As long as the massive power of the American presidency remains in their hands, Bush and Cheney are an intolerable threat to the nation.

Impeachment is the only way members of Congress can fulfill their oath to "support and defend" by eliminating the "potential to harm."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC