Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge: Detainee Can't Speak to Attorney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:32 PM
Original message
Judge: Detainee Can't Speak to Attorney
Edited on Fri Nov-17-06 01:34 PM by cal04
A suspected terrorist who spent years in a secret CIA prison is not allowed to speak to a civilian attorney until an appeals court decides what rights military detainees have, a federal judge said Friday.

The Justice Department argues that under a new anti-terrorism law, detainees have no right to challenge their imprisonment in civilian courts. Human rights groups argue that's unconstitutional.

Until the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia settles the question, legal challenges brought by hundreds of detainees remain in limbo.

(snip)
Attorneys who filed documents on his behalf said Khan needs access to a lawyer because he may have been tortured. The Justice Department objected, saying Khan could reveal details of the CIA program including interrogation techniques.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6222017,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Reveal details"...You mean tell how he was tortured?
But I thought it was all okay and legal....and, gosh, don't we want those pesky arabs to be scared of us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. The new Amurikkka mocking the land of the free and home of the brave
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. What the hell is a detainee?
That term implies a very temporary detention for investigative purposes. It is also a criminal law concerpt, not a military one. People captured in war are prisoners of war, not detainees. Now that he mission is accomplished, they need to be exchanged or paroled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I think you are right to focus on the constant use of that word.
There's something about it that suggests the removal of the person from the usual structures and systems, yet it has no definite legal meaning. It prevalence of this word in our discourse is an example of how the entire society has been led to accept something without even thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. They had a term for this in Ancien Regime France: lettre de cachet.
I thought that our shared Anglo-American common law and statute had done away with this sort of travesty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Guess they should have 'questioned' him some more...like until dead if they
don't want their 'interrogation techniques' outted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC