Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How to Stay in Iraq: The Iraq Study Group Rides to the Rescue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 09:32 PM
Original message
How to Stay in Iraq: The Iraq Study Group Rides to the Rescue
How to Stay in Iraq
The Iraq Study Group Rides to the Rescue
By Tom Engelhardt

Finally, the President and the New York Times agree. In a news conference with the Iraqi Prime Minister last week, George W. Bush insisted that there would be no "graceful exit" or withdrawal from Iraq; that this was not "realism." The next day the Times, in a front page piece (as well as "analysis" inside the paper) pointed out that, "despite a Democratic election victory this month that was strongly based on antiwar sentiment, the idea of a major and rapid withdrawal seems to be fading as a viable option."

In fact, in the media, as in the counsels of James A. Baker's Iraq Study Group, withdrawal without an adjective or qualifying descriptor never arrived as a "viable option." In fact, withdrawal, aka "cut and run," has never been more than a passing foil, one useful "extreme" guaranteed to make the consensus-to-come more comforting.

On Wednesday, at the end of a gestation period nearly long enough to produce a human baby, the Baker committee -- by now, according to the Washington Post's Robin Wright, practically "a parallel policy establishment" -- will hand over to the President its eagerly anticipated "consensus" report, its "compromise" plan that takes the "middle road," that occupies a piece of inside-the-Beltway "middle ground," and that will almost certainly be the policy equivalent of a still birth.

Whatever satisfaction it briefly offers, it might as well be sent directly to the Baghdad morgue. At a length of perhaps 100 pages, evidently calling for an "aggressive" diplomatic engagement with neighboring Iran and Syria -- even unofficial American officials advocating diplomacy just can't seem to avoid some form of "aggression" -- it will also, Washington Post reporters Wright and Thomas Ricks assure us, call for "a major withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq" (no timetables, naturally).

http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=145043
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah sure. An entire Cabinet, Congress and Pentagon at the idiot's disposal
and one tiny little "study" group is going to save the day. What utter bullshit. Well it sure as hell won't be for the sake of the dead, soon to be dead, or those afraid of becoming dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is the part where we leave and stay.
Next, we stay and leave.

Pay no attention to the man behind the screen, maintaining permanent bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thethinker Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-04-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. BS
Bush has no intentions of getting out of Iraq. The Iraq Study Group was created to give him cover. It is a stalling tactic. They are trying to get out in front of a congress controlled by Democrats that will be pressuring him to withdrawal the troops.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC