A Blueprint for Iraq: Will It Work in the White House?

[cal04]

In 142 stark pages, the Iraq Study Group report makes an impassioned plea for bipartisan consensus on the most divisive foreign policy issue of this generation. Without President Bush, that cannot happen.

The commissioners gave a nod to Mr. Bush, adopting his language in accepting the goal of an Iraq that can “govern itself, sustain itself and defend itself.” But the administration’s talk of Iraq as a beacon of democracy in the Middle East is absent, as is any talk of victory.

Instead, the report confronts the president with a powerful argument that his policy in Iraq is not working and that he must move toward disengagement. For Mr. Bush to embrace the study group’s blueprint would mean accepting its implicit criticism of his democracy agenda, reversing course in Iraq and throughout the Middle East and meeting Democrats more than halfway.

Assuming he is not ready to go that far, despite some recent signals of flexibility, he faces the more general question of whether he is ready to embrace the spirit of the report — not to mention the drubbing his party took in the midterm elections a month ago — and produce a new approach of his own that amounts to more than a repackaging of his current worldview.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/07/world/middleeast/07assess.html?hp&ex=1165467600&en=5e43507ceb12dd89&ei=5094&partner=homepage

[necso]

1. ...despite some recent signals of flexibility...

One shouldn't mistake some small, temporary discomfiture* (disconcertion; confusion; embarrassment -- typically, inevitably-overtaken by eventual return to the more normal way of being: in w's case, to arrogant, pig-headed, swaggering stupidity) or some break in public "character" ("face", persona) with (actual, not pretended) changes in "plans", "perspective" or "thinking" (etc); change (significant, substantial, substantiated, longterm, etc) in public persona; change in the expressed face of character; etc.

Certainly, moreover, one should never look for any change in character.

And before wasting time thinking about w changing his ways, one should look for a complete purge of all influential/important neocons in the administration. Absent this, it's just packaging. (Such a purge won't be happening is my guess.)

*: They thought they'd hold the Senate at least; but we beat the cheat-margins in enough places to win. (Thank you, old-school Virginia Democrats.)