Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A War Bush Wouldn't Pay For By E.J. Dionne Jr.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:23 AM
Original message
A War Bush Wouldn't Pay For By E.J. Dionne Jr.
A War Bush Wouldn't Pay For
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/14/AR2006121401364.html

By E.J. Dionne Jr.
Friday, December 15, 2006; Page A35

Believe it or not, winning the war in Iraq was never the Bush administration's highest priority. Saving its tax cuts was more important. That was once spoken of as a moral problem. Now it's a practical barrier to a successful outcome.

Until recently President Bush's refusal to scale back any of his tax cuts was discussed as the question of shared sacrifice: How could we ask so much from a courageous group of Americans fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan but not ask even the wealthiest of their fellow citizens to part with a few extra dollars to support an endeavor supposedly central to our nation's security? On the contrary, even after we committed to war in Iraq, the administration pushed for yet more tax cuts in dividends and capital gains.

Now we know that the decision to put the war on a credit card is not simply a moral question. The administration's failure to acknowledge the real costs of the war -- and to pay them -- has put it in a corner.

The president's options in Iraq are severely constrained because our military is too small for the foreign policy he is pursuing. Sending more troops would place even more excruciating burdens on members of our armed forces and their families. And the brass fears that an extended new commitment could, quite simply, break the Army
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 12:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is doing what he and his kind have always done
soak money from the people who work, and expect others to pay the bills for his follies. If the future of America truly depended on whatever the idiot considers victory in Iraq, he would be calling for rolling back the tax cuts for the mega-wealthy. As it is, he'll find ways to cheat veterans out of whatever benefits they still have left, and do it without one damn about their lives and well being. If he can't screw enough out of veterans, there are always the elderly and children left to fleece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The BushCo is Inept, Corrupt, and Sick...Look at the Damage...it confirms
The Results of 6 years (Republican rule) has now come to the Fore for ALL to Examine and Analyze...They wanted to be Quarter Back and fumbled for 6 years...

Its all Screwed up and they wanna find a way OUT? Wanna continue the Losses? OMG...they just don't get it...do they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No, they don't
They can't. They are too warped to realize, or care, how much damage they have done. When we elect a Democratic president in 2008, let's have a big, big party on the beach. I'll start saving now for plane fare to Hawaii.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You got it...I be saving fire wood for the Luau...and start raising them pigs
and fishes....

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like another ugly truth is admitting how much government really costs
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sam1 Donating Member (136 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-17-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. It would be a contradiction to redistribute wealth upward
and then tax it away from the beneficiaries. This is not what G. W. stands for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC