Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neo-Cons Wanted Israel to Attack Syria (JIM LOBE)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:39 PM
Original message
Neo-Cons Wanted Israel to Attack Syria (JIM LOBE)
Neo-Cons Wanted Israel to Attack Syria

Jim Lobe

WASHINGTON, Dec 18 (IPS) - Neo-conservative hawks in and outside the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush had hoped that Israel would attack Syria during last summer's Lebanon war, according to a newly published interview with a prominent neo-conservative whose spouse is a top Middle East adviser in Vice President Dick Cheney's office.
Meyrav Wurmser, who is herself the director of the Centre for Middle East Policy at the Hudson Institute here, reportedly told Yitzhak Benhorin of the Ynet website that a successful attack by Israel on Damascus would have dealt a mortal blow to the insurgency in Iraq.

"If Syria had been defeated, the rebellion in Iraq would have ended," she asserted, adding that it was chiefly as a result of pressure from what she called "neocons" that the administration held off demands by U.N. Security Council members to halt Israel's attacks on Hezbollah and other targets in Lebanon during the summer war.

"The neocons are responsible for the fact that Israel got a lot of time and space... They believed that Israel should be allowed to win," she told Ynet. "A great part of it was the thought that Israel should fight against the real enemy, the one backing Hezbollah... If Israel had hit Syria, it would have been such a harsh blow for Iran that it would have weakened it and (changed) the strategic map in the Middle East."

Wurmser's remarks bolster reports from Israel that hawks in the Bush administration did, in fact, encourage in the first days of the Israel-Hezbollah conflict the government of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to extend its war beyond Lebanon's borders.

"In a meeting with a very senior Israeli official, Abrams indicated that Washington would have no objection if Israel chose to extend the war beyond to its other northern neighbour, leaving the interlocutor in no doubt that the intended target was Syria," a well-informed source, who received an account of the meeting from one of its participants, told IPS shortly after the conflict ended last August. A similar account was published in the Jerusalem Post at the time.

<more>

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=35888
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks...it's verified what DU'ers Parsed out for THEMSELVES...but
verification "after the fact" is kind of lame...since we all knew this.

One only has to look at the NeoCon's track record to see how they were egging on Olmert to keep the bombing going and CNN and MSNBC played along with all of it until they saw that Hizbullah wouldn't back down and that what the "people" saw Israel doing turned them OFF the whole thing.

The Neo-Cons keep at it ...over and over...not realizing how they hurt Israel's cause by being the "corner of the room" that yaps and mongers for WAR...WAR...MORE WAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I blamed Israel for some of this crap when it was a neocon game all along
Israeli PM Ehud Olmert refused to speak to Assad on talks to settle Israel-Syria land dispute for fear of angering the Americans, according to a recent published report. It now appears that Israel was not the tail that wagged the dog, but that it was the neocon dog that was wagging everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. This blows my mind -
"...If Israel had hit Syria, it would have been such a harsh blow for Iran that it would have weakened it and (changed) the strategic map in the Middle East."

In their simplistic world view, Hezbollah = Syris = Iran. Nevermind that the middle of the equation, Syria, is Sunni and Baathist, while Hezbollah is Arab and Shiite, and Iran is Persian, not Arab, and Shiite.

There are complex relationships there that involve very different players, but the neocons seem to see them as all the same bad guy.

No wonder everything they do is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. NeoCons are watching their PNAc plan failing
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-19-06 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. This Piece Of Spittle & Her Worm Of A Husband
have been on Syria's case for years. I'm sure they have convinced themselves that Israel did such a fantastic job against Hezbollah, that Syria would be a cake walk. Of for these two to get their comeuppance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC