E&P: Back in the Days of 'Mission Accomplished': How the NYT Covered Bush Declaration 4 Years Ago

[maddezmom]

NEW YORK Today marks the fourth anniversary of President Bush’s jet landing on the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln and his speech declaring major fighting in Iraq over, all in front of a giant “Mission Accomplished” banner.

At the time, it was heralded by the mainstream media as a fitting moment of triumph. "He won the war," boomed MSNBC's Chris Matthews. "He was an effective commander. Everybody recognizes that, I believe, except a few critics."

Since then, it has become -- during four more years of death and war -- a symbol of American hubris and setbacks in Iraq. Today it is often lampooned as a tragic “photo op.” Rock singer Neil Young, in a song referencing the event, sings, "History is a cruel judge of overconfidence."

When Bush spoke, the U.S. had 150,000 troops in Iraq; the number now stands at 160,000 or more. American casualties at the time were 139 killed and 542 wounded. A year ago they stood at 2,400 killed and now it's 3,300 dead.

With that in mind, here are excerpts revealing how one newspaper, The New York Times, covered the event and aftermath four years ago. They include this nugget: "The Bush administration is planning to withdraw most United States combat forces from Iraq over the next several months and wants to shrink the American military presence to less than two divisions by the fall, senior allied officials said today."
*

more:http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003578624&imw=Y

[acmavm]

1. The NYT has been one of the best propaganda machines

this administration could ask for. As a matter of fact, I've neglected to point out lately how much the crap rag is responsible for.

[Skittles]

2. and repukes still think it is the epitome of the "liberal media"

it just floors me