Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tenet Battled With the Office of Special Plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 02:31 PM
Original message
Tenet Battled With the Office of Special Plans
Tenet Battled With the Office of Special Plans
By Matt Renner
t r u t h o u t | Report

Wednesday 02 May 2007

In his book, "At the Center of the Storm," former Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet describes efforts by Pentagon and White House officials to subvert pre-Iraq war intelligence assessment by the CIA.

Tenet focuses on the actions of a group inside the Pentagon that sent the Bush administration bogus intelligence on Iraq's weapons program and ties to terrorist organizations that supported the administration's policy.

This group was recently criticized by a Department of Defense inspector general report from February 9, 2007, which found that a policy-shop known as "the Office of Special Plans," headed by the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith, acted "inappropriately" by cooking intelligence to reflect a "mature and symbiotic" relationship between Iraq and al-Qa'ida. This characterization was never supported by the CIA, but was presented as fact by Feith's office to White House policy makers in the run up to the Iraq war.

Former CIA intelligence officer Larry C. Johnson called the Office of Special Plans (OSP) "a hodgepodge put together by folks with an agenda." According to Johnson, "The administration started with a presumption of guilt, and the OSP was to hang the ornaments on the tree."

According to Tenet, White House officials tried to prevent the CIA from publishing their own analysis on the relationship between Iraq and al-Qa'ida. A draft report of the CIA analysis of the relationship was sent to the White House in December, 2002, resulting in "a series of calls from the White House," that asked CIA to “revise or withdraw the paper." Tenet names Libby and Hadley as two of the White House officials who made these calls. Tenet claims that a previous draft of this report was given to the DOD for their feedback. Tenet says that Feith's office responded saying that they did have objections “but would make their views known through other channels."

Tenet claims that he did not know the briefings continued despite his direction to Jacoby. As head of the DIA, Jacoby had two bosses: Tenet and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Tenet points out this fact but does not explicitly say that Rumsfeld overruled his direction to Jacoby. The inspector general report concluded that the "inappropriate" activities of Feith's office were authorized by Rumsfeld or his former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz.

<more>

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/printer_050207A.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Glad To See The OSP Being Outed to the General Public
It's the least Tenet could do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. So? What? Does he want a medal?
Oh...wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah I know. He wants to eat the cake & vomit it back up on the host too.
He's a cheese-eating weasel alright but at least his book is generating some stories about Little Dougie's OSP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You know...
There really isn't a fate too gory or horrible or unthinkable for Little Dougie. In fact, I feel that too little time has been spent on creative thinking in this regard. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC