Commentary: Mother’s Day doesn’t hide bias against working moms

[Omaha Steve]

http://www.wctrib.com/articles/index.cfm?id=20044§ion=opinion&forumcomm_check_return&freebie_check&CFID=33926824&CFTOKEN=95343444&jsessionid=8830515d289f11777632

Commentary: Mother’s Day doesn’t hide bias against working moms
Ellen Goodman, West Central Tribune
Published Friday, May 11, 2007
BOSTON — It’s become a Mother’s Day tradition on a par with candy, flowers and guilt. While advertisers wax poetically about the priceless work of motherhood, economists tally up the paycheck for the services she performs.

This year, salary.com estimates the value of a full-time mom at $138,095, up 3 percent from last year. The monetary value of a second-shift mom is $85,939, on top of her day job.

But, alas, the check is not in the mail. Nor will mom find it next to the maple syrup on her bed tray. Motherhood is what the economists call a monopsony, a job for which there is only one employer. And it’s a rare child who’s saved up to fill mom’s piggybank, let alone a 401(k).

The real story of the Mother’s Day economy is less rosy. This is what to expect when you are expecting — expecting to be a mom and a paid worker at the same time. You can expect to be mommified.

Mothers are still treated as if they were a third gender in the workplace. Among people ages 27 to 33 who have never had children, women’s earnings approach 98 percent of men’s. Many women will hit the glass ceiling, but many more will crash into the maternal wall.

Here’s a Mother’s Day card from a study just published by Shelley Correll in the American Journal of Sociology. Correll performed an experiment to see if there was a motherhood penalty in the job market. She and her colleagues at Cornell University created an ideal job applicant with a successful track record, an uninterrupted work history, a boffo resume, the whole deal.

FULL story at link.