Ashcroft's lesson lost on Gonzales
Who knew? Maybe the often-controversial John Ashcroft was a better U.S. attorney general than he has been given credit for. At least in one case, he certainly seemed to grasp the unique responsibilities of the office better than the current one, Alberto Gonzales.
Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week highlighted a nuanced but important contrast between the two men's views of the attorney general's role. As the nation's attorney first, Ashcroft stood up to White House overreaching with a domestic-surveillance program. Gonzales acts as henchman, facilitating a shadowy partisan agenda and appearing to consider the public's interests only as an afterthought.
~snip~
Comey's story seems to support a serious criticism of Gonzales — that, when he became attorney general, he never grasped the role's larger responsibility of advancing justice for Americans. Instead, he seemed to run the Justice Department as an extension of the White House, letting partisan agendas slosh over into department workings, including the firings.
We will say it again: Gonzales needs to resign.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorialsopinion/2003711442_ashcrofted18.html?syndication=rss