Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Shallow Throat": Dems' Cave-In Is Truly Scary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
CrisisPapers Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 07:51 AM
Original message
"Shallow Throat": Dems' Cave-In Is Truly Scary
| Bernard Weiner |

"Shallow Throat" looked like a ghost -- exhausted, pallid skin, and, when the wrap-around shades came off, I could see dark circles under the eyes.

The GOP mole high up in the Bush Administration had contacted me through our secret code. Given our numerous conversations over the past six years, where the inner secrets of Republican strategy were revealed, I hurried to set up a meeting. This one was in a back room of a pharmacy in a location near Washington, D.C.

"You don't look so hot," I said.

"You should see the other guy," said ST, using the old joke but with a grimace. "I feel like crap because the tenure of these extremists in the White House has just been guaranteed for the next year-and-a-half by your liberal Democrat buddies. They had CheneyBush backed into a corner, on the ropes, reeling, and the Dems backed away.

"Whoa, wait a minute," I interjected, "I'm just as appalled as you are by the craven surrender of the Democratic leadership on the war-funding bill, lobbying reform and the possibility of impeachment hearings. So don't hang that charge around my neck. The progressive base of the party, which I support, has been very active in trying to get Pelosi and Reid and the others to do the right thing on these issues and in denouncing them when they don't."

Shallow Throat thundered a reply: "If you progressives want to get through to the Dem leaders, you'll have to lead them! Right now, they have you by the shorts. They know that regardless of what they do, you liberals have nowhere else to go. You're not going to support the GOP, you're not going to commit suicide by trying to form a third party, so they can just run over you, time and time again, convinced that you'll eventually come back to the fold with your money and energy because the Republicans are even worse. Why shouldn't they take you for granted? You make it so easy for them."

WILL DEM BASE STICK WITH THE PARTY?

ST scratched at the new wig and continued: "Your guys blew your one best chance to stop this war, or at least to begin to bring it to a close. I could understand the Dems' timidity if the population were evenly divided on the issue of the war and the need to get our young soldiers out of there ASAP, but, damn it, that's not the case!

"Nearly 70% of the public agrees that Bush's war strategy is mistaken and will lead to even more deaths and maiming of untold numbers of U.S. troops and Iraqi civilians. By nearly two-thirds, the public is in support of starting to withdraw our troops soon. In short, your ass was covered! Why on earth would you give in so easily after just one or two tries? You could have let Bush veto the war-funding bill for the second time and sent it back to him again and again, each time carving away a few more wavering Republicans. You could hammer Bush each time as not being willing to bend a bit to 'support the troops'.

"Instead, out of fear of being criticized for 'not supporting the troops' and and for being insufficiently 'patriotic,' you gave away the store, and became, ipso facto, enablers of the Republicans and this slaughter. The blood of young American troops is now on your hands, too. Now it's not just Bush's war, but also the Democrats' war! How could your Dem buddies have been so stupid?"

COULD DEMS LOSE WHITE HOUSE IN 2008?

Shallow Throat was breathing heavily after those white-hot denunciations. I passed over my water bottle and let the traditional conservative official take a long swig.

"I agree that they blew this one big time," I said. "I think that the vacationing Senators and Representatives will feel the heat of the public's anger this week when they are back home. I suspect they will come back to Washington with more starch in their spines to hold the Bush Administration's feet to the fire in September."

"As a lifelong Republican," said Shallow Throat, "I guess I'm expected to take comfort in how badly the Democrats are bumbling with regard to the race for the White House in 2008. The GOP could lose the House and Senate again but hang onto the Presidency, and that's supposed to make me feel good.

"But, as I've told you many times, Bernie, I am appalled and terrified by the brand of far-right extremists who have hijacked my party. Just looking at the crop of candidates running for the GOP nomination -- not one of them electable who proudly represents those of us in the traditional-conservative middle -- doesn't give me hope that anybody decent will emerge that would change the self-destructive direction of the party. And it's not clear whether the Democrats will come up with anyone significantly better.

"Let's face it, plutocrats in hock to or agreeing with corporate/military-industrial mentalities are in control of most of the leadership of both parties. Granted, the Republican leaders are much more authoritarian and greedy and vicious, but the Democratic leaders, lacking a unifying moral and political theory of governance, aren't all that much better. Almost all of them owe their souls to the company store, as it were."

THERE IS RAGING ANGER OUT THERE

"What I find somewhat optimistic," I countered, "is that the liberal/progressive citizen base of the party is filled with seething anger at the sell-out of their leaders on the war-funding bill and will direct their rage right where it needs to go -- to Pelosi and Reid and Emanuel and the whole DLC crew. This Democratic boat will be turned from its present direction. Come September--"

"September is too damn late!" interrupted Shallow Throat. "The Dems have just given the war a long-term lease, at the very least until Bush and Cheney depart the White House in January of 2009. The Dems will just be nibbling around the edges of the policy they've authorized by their cowardly vote approving the war funding."

"So what options are available?" I asked. "Just demonstrating and shouting our anger at these creeps doesn't seem to get us anywhere. Where should we be going?"

"USE THE POWER YOU HAVE"

"Look," said Shallow Throat, "your side still has some leverage. You control the Congress and thus can use the investigative function, subpoena powers, putting witnesses under oath, etc.

"But, damn it, you have these one-day hearings, a lot of fulminating when the Administration witnesses skirt and evade the questions, and then you let them go. If you really want to learn what really happened, you'll have to invite or subpoena them back again and again until you get full, honest answers, threaten them and maybe even cite them for contempt of Congress.

"If necessary, take them to court to get them to supply the documents and copies of e-mails you subpoenaed; establish an impeachment panel and start the early work on Gonzales, Cheney, Bush; inquire how Bush, with last week's secret 'National Security Presidential Directive,' totally cut the Congress out of any say in how the government would be organized in case of an 'emergency' -- he appointed himself sole decider of all matters civil and legislative, including when to declare martial law, and nobody is permitted to override his dictatorial decisions."

"Not sure any investigations along those lines will necessarily lead anywhere, practically speaking," I said. "The Republicans have ways of gumming up the works."

CHANGING THE DYNAMIC

"So what?" Shallow Throat yelled. "At least give the public some truths to hang onto, and some hope that the Democrats are trying to do something rather than just rolling on their backs in total submission to the snarling tactics of Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and their friends. Besides, you need to keep those guys on the defensive every day of every week. Don't let them get traction, momentum. Force them to play defense, scatter their energies, let them sweat for a change.

"And I suggest you get right on it, since the HardRight extremists running this Administration and the GOP in Congress have all sorts of bad news up their sleeves, including another major escalation of the Iraq War, aiding in an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities and military installations, and clamping down even more on Americans' constitutional rights, including the possible declaration of martial law."

"Now you're really scaring me," I said.

THE FRIGHTENING POSSIBILITIES

"Good! You'd better be frightened," said Shallow Throat. "If the Republicans hold the White House in the 2008 election, we could have a kind of civil war inside the military right here in this country.

"When General Petraus comes back to the Congress in September and says we're making 'enough progress' to justify a continuation and even expansion of this country's escalation, there will be a political insurrection inside the Pentagon, with mass resignations of the highest-ranking officers in the military, conservative men and women willing to take on the Bush Administration and those officers who choose to stay and obey these reckless, likely illegal Administration orders. These officers of conscience will not, by their silence, acquiesce to more self-destructive madness, more wrecking of an already stressed, stretched-too-thin military and National Guard; more shredding of the Con--"

I interrupted: "Are you suggesting the possibility of an armed confrontation between the two sides, or just a massive public airing of different points of view about U.S. military policy around the world? Is this what you meant by the possibility of martial law?"

"Hear what I'm saying. There are growing rumbles from both inside and outside the government: If the situation after September looks hopeless in preserving the Constitution and re-establishing a sane foreign/military policy, and if key nations decide to take America down a peg by calling-in the U.S. debt bonds they hold (thus ruining the United States economy), nothing will be off the table inside this country," said Shallow Throat, and left the room.

I sat there stunned, unable to move, petrified by fear.

-- BW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. This Has Been My Fear Since 2000--Civil War Part 2
How little consolation it is that a life-long conservative like Shallow Throat now agrees with me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Take a look at the votes in the House..194 Republicans and 86 Democrats
voted for the funding bill without timetables.So if a withdrawal time table was included do you think they would have gotten a two thirds vote to override a veto..four months worth of funding but yet the Democrats cave..Right now who needs Republican talking points when the Democrats are doing a fine job of spinning this as "it all the Democrats fault" and the "Democrats have no chance of regaining their Majority" Karl Rove could not have written a better script..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. What are you going on about?
Why not introduce a bill no one would vote for? Like the Rethugs did to torpedo the Murtha bill? Remember that one?

Why do you think it is necessary to have a veto-proof majority in order to govern?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thx...
Good little read...your a talented writer and you see the big picture.

Both dangerous things...good for you!

:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Their crimes are public. Impeach Now to "support and defend". . .
Edited on Tue May-29-07 06:06 PM by pat_k
. . .there is no moral alternative. All else is surrender to the bushcheney steamroller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. This hasn't been "politics as usual" since November 2000
Most people are just figuring that out.

THey should have caught on w/ 9/11 and the anthrax -- for which non one has ever been prosicuted. No way any of that went down the way they've said. NO WAY IN HELL.

So what've you got then?

It ain't a republic and they've made that abundantly clear time and time again but everyone just goes on acting like it is, or might be, or could be only if . . .

And the "opposition party"??

You've got to be kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-29-07 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. We need to adopt a "Republicans First" policy
At their worst the Democrats are infinitely better than the fascist Republicons.
The Democrats have made it plain that they will hang in Iraq.
The obvious cause is a train load of money from disloyal energy corporations.
I'm not sure my own integrity could stand up to that kind of assault.
In any case, the 'cons need to be driven out of the Senate and the White House first.
Then we need to purge the government of all persons hired after 2000AD.
They typical Bushco hire can pray like hell but needs to remove their shoes to count 11.
We need them gone, right now.
If we can't fire these duds they can be reassigned en masse to clean up duty in New Orleans.
Once these are accomplished, it should be possible to snuff the war, bribe money or not.
Remember it took years of open rioting and the sh*tcanning of Nixon to snuff Viet Nam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-30-07 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Problem I see there, Shallow throat, is that over the last six years
Edited on Wed May-30-07 10:21 PM by truedelphi
A whole lot of people at the Pentagon have already resigned.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wadda read
I'm dumbstruck by the truth of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC