Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Per) PALAST: IRAQ INVASION WAS TO ENSURE NATION DID NOT EXCEED OPEC QUOTA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 10:59 AM
Original message
(Per) PALAST: IRAQ INVASION WAS TO ENSURE NATION DID NOT EXCEED OPEC QUOTA
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/23143

PALAST: IRAQ INVASION WAS TO ENSURE NATION DID NOT EXCEED OPEC QUOTA
Submitted by davidswanson on Thu, 2007-05-31 15:33. Media

By Sherwood Ross

Iraq was invaded in order to limit its oil production and thus keep world oil prices artificially high, a noted investigative journalist reports.

"Iraq's output in 2003, 2004, and 2005 was less than produced under the restrictive oil-for-food program," writes Greg Palast in his new book Armed Madhouse (Plume). Oil-for-food allowed Iraq to sell 2 million barrels per day during the 1995 to 2003 period.

"Whether by design or happenstance, this decline in output has resulted in tripling the profits of the five US oil majors to $89 billion for a single year, 2005, compared to pre-invasion 2002," Palast writes.

snip//

Palast says OPEC is a front for the international oil companies. "If oil companies had created this cartel to fix prices, that would have made it a criminal conspiracy - cartels are illegal. But when governments conspire for the same purpose, the illegal conspiracy turns into a legitimate "alliance" of sovereign states. OPEC's government cover makes the price fixing perfectly legal, and Big Oil reaps the rewards."

Palast said Saudi Arabia and other OPEC nations take Americans' money at the pump, and in their heating and electric bills, and use it to buy up US government notes. In 2005, $243 billion in petro-dollars was collected from Americans by OPEC. Foreigners then bought up $311 billion in US government debts, he said.

"All the goodies, from nuclear subs to tax cuts to war in Mesopotamia appear to be 'free' to the taxpayer," Palast writes. "It's all just put on the tab, the national debt, including the interest on it. The actual cash needed to pay for these budget busters is first collected from US consumers via the hidden oil tax for which Mr. Bush takes no blame."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Which is why a huge windfall profits tax is so necessary.
Vital to us and to the world really. Poorhouse the pricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. And why Bush says we'll need to keep troops there for 50 years ...
like in South Korea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. this glimpse of the men behind the curtain must go directly to the greatest page....
K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Wo, truth is illuminating. It makes sense now.-a business deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, this makes it crystal clear, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is critical for everyone to read and understand.
Edited on Thu May-31-07 12:26 PM by seafan
From PALAST: IRAQ INVASION WAS TO ENSURE NATION DID NOT EXCEED OPEC QUOTA, May 31, 2007


.....

"When OPEC raises the price of crude, Big Oil makes out big time," says Palast, who has contributed to BBC Television and the Guardian newspapers.
He points out the oil majors are not simply passive resellers of the Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) production but have reserves of their own which rise in tandem with oil prices.


"The rise in the price of oil after the first three years of the war boosted the value of the reserves of ExxonMobil Oil alone by just over $666 billion," Palast wrote. What's more, Chevron Oil, "where Condoleezza Rice had served as a director, gained a quarter trillion dollars in value."
Another big winner in the Iraq war is Saudi Arabia. The war-stoked jump in oil prices, Palast writes, put $120 billion in Saudi Arabia's treasury in 2004, triple its normal take.


Among the big losers have been American motorists, now paying about $3.30 for a gallon (3.8 liters) of gas. The oil price spike has also punished US industry, costing America an estimated 1.2 million jobs. "Higher borrowing costs for business since the beginning of the Iraq war are bleeding manufacturing investment," Palast adds.


Rising oil prices are an anomaly. The world's petroleum reserves have doubled from 648 billion to 1.2 trillion barrels in the past 25 years, Palast reports. According to free market laws of supply and demand, discovery of these immense new pools should cause prices to drop.
Big Oil's interest is in "suppressing production," Palast writes, stating "An international industry policy of suppressing Iraqi oil production has been in place since 1927."

.....

Iraq has 74 known oil fields but only 15 are in production and 526 known pools of oil of which only 125 have been drilled. Again, only 15,000 rigs in Iraq are pumping up black gold, compared, for example, to 1 million rigs in Texas.
In 2005, Iraq exported only 1.4 million barrels of oil daily, less than under Saddam, less than half its old OPEC quota, and less than a fourth of its ultimate capacity, Palast reports.


"Though technically owned by the Iraqis through their state oil company, we can expect the crude to be gathered and controlled downstream by the same old hands, British Petroleum, Chevron, and other IOC's that first drew that nation's borders, politely fulfilling Iraq's quota assigned by the Saudis, no more, maybe less," Palast writes.


In addition to clapping a lid on Iraqi production, Palast charges the US "promoted sabotage of oil piping, loading, and refining systems in Venezuela" to limit that country's production.
Palast reminds that Venezuela, once the top exporter to the US, broke the back of the 1973 Arab oil embargo by replacing the oil withdrawn by Saudi Arabia. " Chavez, despised by Bush, was not likely to save Bush's bacon by busting another embargo. Therefore, Chavez had to go immediately," Palast writes.

.....




Hmmmm.... sabotage of pipelines and refining systems in Venezuela. Could it be that the US also promoted sabotage of Iraqi pipelines, while very craftily and cynically blaming it on *insurgents*?

Maybe that's where that missing $8.8 Billion went... to pay people in bricks of cash to blow up oil infrastructure in Iraq, thereby ensuring the slowdown of oil flowing out of Iraq?

It really all fits together neatly, doesn't it?


And all the while, they are trying to distract us with immigration, abortion, gays, religion and tawdry stories of celebrities.



We are past the point of no return. We absolutely MUST REMOVE THESE PEOPLE AND ALL OF THEIR BLOODY, AVARICIOUS TENTACLES FROM OUR GOVERNMENT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Big oil claims reserves are up
Rising oil prices are an anomaly. The world's petroleum reserves have doubled from 648 billion to 1.2 trillion barrels in the past 25 years,


While World production is down



Because counting the Canadian tar sands as increased reserves, is tuff not to crack, yes we can make gasoline out of the tar sands, yes we can drill 25,000 feet down, (thru 7,000 feet of ocean and then 18,000 ft of rock)... but its going to cost a dollar to get a $1.30 of gas....

All the easy oil (shallow light sweet crude) has been gotten. The rest of it is sour and heavy and deeper, much deeper.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think this explanation is perhaps the best.
Note also that the preceding 12 years of embargo also kept Iraqi oil off the market, but that the embargo was slowly breaking down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Iraq War: brought to you by the Texas-American Petroleum Cartel,
Edited on Thu May-31-07 12:27 PM by Raster
and the Military Industrial Complex.

War is a good business, invest a child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. He's been saying this for a while...
I heard him speak in LA last year and he said the same thing.

It makes total sense. It's not about getting the oil, it's about turning it off to raise prices. That's also the reason that Hugo Chavez is an "enemy" to the Bushies, he's not playing by OPEC rules, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Take it further
If you're a totally amoral president in bed with the oil lobby, would it not be in your interests to deliberately bungle the occupation, thereby keeping the nation in chaos and prices high?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
11. Taking on OPEC, House Passes 'NOPEC' Bill


Maya Jackson Randall reports on energy legislation. 5/22

The White House threatened a veto, but that gave few lawmakers pause as the House today easily approved a bill that would let the Justice Department sue members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries for using anticompetitive measures to... more

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2007/05/22/taking-on-opec-house-passes-nopec-bill/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. I doubt this claim
There was a decline in Iraqi oil do to incompetence, but I highly doubt it was planned that way, especially given Bush's record of accomplishments for the rest of Iraq.

I could be wrong, but I need to see more evidence to convince me otherwise.

Is there evidence the Iraq was exceeding OPEC quotas before the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-31-07 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Google should help you out; give it a try. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeDuffy Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. I STRONGLY doubt this also.
Edited on Fri Jun-01-07 09:57 AM by MikeDuffy
Why has Greg never (so far as I know) responded to Richard Heinberg's "An Open Letter to Greg Palast" concerning Palast's other Peak Oil denial material in his "Armed Madhouse"?: http://www.energybulletin.net/17914.html
Somebody in Iraq with the power to do so is stealing untold millions of barrels of un-metered oil a day -- who could that be?

Here is a chart of global oil supply by quarter (the un-shown 1st qtr 07 declined a bit from 4th qtr 06, I believe). How would you describe what this chart depicts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeDuffy Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Chart link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. I suppose "mistakes were made" disavows the OP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. That makes me sick.
No. Really sick, I'm ging to bed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
19. Saddam was also ready to go with the Euro. Hence the urgency
It really makes me ill to think that we overturned a legitimate government and then assisted in the execution of its leader. In addition we, the good old USA, have killed/murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis. Saddam should have been tried by the International Court. Bush and his minions have murdered more Iraqi citizens than Hussein. Are they going to be hung?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC