Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dave Lindorff: Impeachment on a Roll

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 07:50 PM
Original message
Dave Lindorff: Impeachment on a Roll
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/1067


Dave Lindorff: Impeachment on a Roll


On the East Coast, where the prevailing winds are offshore, the surf tends to be pretty tame, and Thursday was no exception, with the biggest waves cresting at perhaps three feet. Nonetheless, these little combers were able to send my prone body racing 100 feet toward the beach at a good clip.
There's a lot of energy packed in even a small wave... One thing you can say about waves -- even small ones -- and that is that they are pretty much unstoppable. Another thing you can say is that they wear down resistance -- especially when the resistance is insubstantial. A third thing is that they are never alone. They keep on coming, one after another after another.


Just so with impeachment, where a wave is slowly building for the impeachment of Vice President Dick Cheney.

Since Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) filed his impeachment bill against Cheney on April 24, five other members of the House have signed on as co-sponsors, most recently Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA), co-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. She joins Reps. Yvette Clarke (D-NY), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL and chief deputy whip of the House), William Lacy Clay (D-IL) and Albert Wynn (D-MD) as co-sponsors of H. Res. 333.
-------------------------
Flash Update! Just to make the point about how this wave is building, shortly after I filed this piece, Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), another co-chair of the House Progressive Caucus, signed on as a co-sponsor of H.Res. 333. Cheney has to be starting to sweat.
-------------------------



We can find evidence that Pelosi is losing her footing in many forms.

There's the impeachment resolution passed late last month by the Detroit City Council. Now there have been nearly 100 such resolutions passed around the country, but this one stands out because it was introduced by Council President Monica Conyers, who happens to be the wife of Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, which would be where any impeachment hearing would be conducted. Conyers was once a leading advocate of the impeachment of Bush and Cheney, but buckled when Pelosi threatened to deny him the coveted chair of the Judiciary Committee. Clearly, his wife thinks he shouldn't have caved, and Conyers is showing signs of wanting action on impeachment. He has lately taken to encouraging the actions of impeachment activists.

There are also the many resolutions calling for impeachment of Bush and Cheney that have been passed, often overwhelmingly, by state Democratic Parties, including those in California, Massachusetts, and North Carolina.

Finally, there are the statements from Democratic politicians, who are looking increasingly ridiculous in their efforts to avoid talking impeachment. Take Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY). Back in 2006, Nadler was a member of the group of 39 House members in the 109th Congress who signed on to Rep. Conyers' then bill calling for a select committee to investigate impeachable crimes by the administration (that bill died with the end of the 109th Congress). Recently, Nadler, who sat on the impeachment panel during the Clinton impeachment farce, and who chairs the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, declared in a recent radio interview that "there's a prima facie case" that the president and the attorney general "engaged in a criminal conspiracy." He went on to say that when the executive branch is "contemptuous of the power of Congress" and breaks or ignores the law, then "you have to use whatever weapons the Constitution gives Congress."

Now Nadler is no dummy. He knows that the main "tool" that the Constitution gives to Congress to combat such presidential lawlessness and abuse of power is impeachment. Nadler's constituency in Manhattan isn't stupid either. They know the president has been committing impeachable crimes, and that the remedy is impeachment. The same is true of Rep. Conyers' constituents. It seems only a matter of time before these leaders, and others like them, are going to have to take a stand and buck Pelosi and the sell-out Democratic leadership that is trying to adopt a do-nothing strategy ahead of the 2008 elections. I'm betting that we're going to see Pelosi and her anti-impeachment position swamped by the power of public pressure, and by the actions of those members of Congress who take the views of their constituents seriously.

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION

DAVE LINDORFF is co-author, with Barbara Olshansky, of The Case for
Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office (St. Martin's Press, 2006), now available in paperback. His work is available at thiscantbehappening.net.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'll take an impeachment on a roll,
with a side of tar and feathers please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-08-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Coming Up! With 2, You Get Eggroll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC