Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was General Pace Fired Because He Balked at Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 06:15 PM
Original message
Was General Pace Fired Because He Balked at Iran
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_levey__m_070609_was_general_pace_fir.htm

Was General Pace Fired Because He Balked at Iran

by Levey MG Page 1 of 4 page(s)

snip//

"The enemy now is basically evil and fundamentally hates everything we are -- the democratic principles for which we stand ... This war is going to go on for a long time. It's a generational war."


http://starbulletin.com/2007/05/08/news/story05.html

Read that again. Mullen says he thinks we're in a Long War with Evil. Who does that sound like? Click the link above and take a look at Admiral Mullen. That man, if confirmed by the Senate, will have all of our lives in his hands. Is he the man you want to have that responsibility? You do have a say in that - let your Senator know what you think.

When Pace goes, there may be a further shake-out of the Joint Chiefs to remove the other top brass who have reportedly opposed the Surge into Iran. I am afraid that may leave it all in the laps of Congress.

Either the Senate Democrats get their act together, block this appointment, AND get on with the overdue job of Impeachment, or we should be ready to start losing more American cities.

If you liked the preventable losses of the WTC and NOLA, you're going to love the impact of the next act of malign incompetence of the Bush-Cheney Administration. If you liked the optional war in Iraq, now appearing on Central Stage, global war with Iran and Shi'a Islam.

By the way - a war with Iran still doesn't make any military sense. Least of all for the troops on the ground in Iraq, who will be facing an uprising by at least 60 percent of the Iraqi population, which is Shi'a. Maybe, just maybe, Congress understands that. Our Senators can show their understanding of this issue by denying the Admiral's confirmation.

Blocking Mullen and Impeaching Bush may be the most important things we ever do.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know
all the petitions the money I've sent over these years, it seems to make no difference, just makes it looks like there "really" is an opposition, but it all seems a farce sometimes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pace is too much a kiss-ass to oppose anyone in the hierarchy...
My guess is that, given the impending conflict w/ Iran is going to be an air/sea war, they wanted to put a Navy man at the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pace: No Evidence Tying Iranian Government To Smuggled Explosives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hopefully the Repugs in Congress have told Bush, if he attacks Iran
Not only will they lose the WH in 2008 but major loses in both houses.

But then again they probably have not thought it out. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bush doesn't care
He just does what "God" tells him :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-09-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. because Pace would be required to go before Congress for questioning /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. Uh-oh - this a u-turn for levey
not good at all...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC