Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Microsoft Finds Legal Defender in Justice Dept. (NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-10-07 08:54 PM
Original message
Microsoft Finds Legal Defender in Justice Dept. (NYT)
Source: New York Times

Microsoft Finds Legal Defender in Justice Dept.

By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: June 10, 2007

WASHINGTON, June 9 — Nearly a decade after the government began
its landmark effort to break up Microsoft, the Bush administration has
sharply changed course by repeatedly defending the company both in
the United States and abroad against accusations of anticompetitive
conduct, including the recent rejection of a complaint by Google.

The retrenchment reflects a substantially different view of antitrust
policy, as well as a recognition of major changes in the marketplace.
The battlefront among technology companies has shifted from computer
desktop software, a category that Microsoft dominates, to Internet
search and Web-based software programs that allow users to bypass
products made by Microsoft, the world’s largest software maker.

In the most striking recent example of the policy shift, the top antitrust
official at the Justice Department last month urged state prosecutors to
reject a confidential antitrust complaint filed by Google that is tied to
a consent decree that monitors Microsoft’s behavior. Google has accused
Microsoft of designing its latest operating system, Vista, to discourage
the use of Google’s desktop search program, lawyers involved in the case
said.

The official, Thomas O. Barnett, an assistant attorney general, had until
2004 been a top antitrust partner at the law firm that has represented
Microsoft in several antitrust disputes. At the firm, Justice Department
officials said, he never worked on Microsoft matters. Still, for more than
a year after arriving at the department, he removed himself from the
case because of conflict of interest issues. Ethics lawyers ultimately
cleared his involvement.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/10/business/10microsoft.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC