Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time once again to play--Selective Outrage!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:38 AM
Original message
Time once again to play--Selective Outrage!
The fun and timeless game that will make you forget all about the global elite-sponsored race to the bottom! Now remember boyzngirlz, don't start slobbering until Dr. Pavlov points at the Enemy du Jour and rings the bell!

Mr. Peabody, set the Wayback Machine for-- 1979!

Pol Pot had slaughtered millions of Cambodians to widespread condemnation, while at the same time Indonesia was performing a similar slaughter in East Timor to the sound of..........crickets. They even got large increases in military aid from the US. Then, Vietnam invaded Cambodia retaliating for border incursions, and deposed Pol Pot. Now, turn on a dime, kidz, because Pol Pot then became our noble ally.

http://www.irc-online.org/fpif/commentary/2003/0301iraq_body.html

When Vietnam invaded Cambodia in early 1979 and overthrew that genocidal regime, the United States denounced the Vietnamese as aggressors and successfully led international efforts to impose sanctions on Vietnam. For more than a decade, both Democratic and Republican administrations insisted that the Khmer Rouge thugs, whose control had been reduced to remote jungle hideouts near the Thai border, were the sole legitimate rulers of Cambodia and blocked the recognition of the Vietnamese-installed government. The reason, according to U.S. officials, was that no matter how repressive a regime may be, it does not give another country the right to invade that country, topple its government, and install one of its own choosing.


Wow! Really!?!?!

Mr. Peabody--1996, please.

OUr ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad, formerly of UNOCAL oil and ambassador to Afghanistan, was writing op eds defending the Taliban.

http://www.counterpunch.org/issam04172003.html

Khalilzad's attitude to the Taliban seems to have correlated well with UNOCAL's efforts to build the pipeline. At the time, he defended the Taliban in an opinion published in The Washington Post. "The Taliban do not practice the anti-U.S. style of fundamentalism practiced by Iran," he wrote in 1996. "We should...be willing to offer recognition and humanitarian assistance and to promote international economic reconstruction. It is time for the United States to re-engage," he concluded.


Hop in and fast forward to 1998--

Turn on a dime again, kidz. Time to start with the crocodile tears for all the women in burkhas now that we want to bomb the shit out of them.

Easy and fun! And the brainwipes hardly hurt at all, do they?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-11-07 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. When you don't have your own moral compass, and you choose to
Edited on Mon Jun-11-07 06:48 AM by bluerum
"follow the leader", you will often find yourself running in circles.

I remember reading some job recruiting literature when I was looking for a job after graduating from college. It said something along the lines of - "If you don't know what you want to do with your life, there are plenty of people willing to tell you what you to do."

The problem is, when you let people tell you what to do, you usually ends up serving their interests at your expense.

on edit: edit last sentence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC