Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stevens Asks Ethics to Review Finances before he officially files them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 03:24 AM
Original message
Stevens Asks Ethics to Review Finances before he officially files them
Stevens Asks Ethics to Review Finances
Capitol Briefing can report more details on at least one of the extensions granted to lawmakers who did not file personal financial disclosure forms last month:

Sen. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) asked the Senate Ethics Committee to review his finances from last year before he officially files them. His office declined to specify why he made that request.

"At Senator Stevens's request, the Senate Ethics Committee is reviewing his 2006 financial disclosure. That process is still ongoing, therefore it was necessary for Senator Stevens to file an extension," said Aaron Saunders, spokesman for Stevens.

Stevens, 83, the longest-serving Republican in Senate history, has been asked by federal investigators to preserve records related to a widening corruption inquiry in Alaska that has brought four indictments of current and former state legislators and plea agreements from a pair of energy company executives. The executives, one of whom is a close friend of Stevens, pleaded guilty to paying more than $400,000 in bribes to the state lawmakers, including an unindicted "state Senator B" whose consulting payments, according to court records, match those reported by Ben Stevens, the son of Sen. Stevens and a former state senator.

more:http://blog.washingtonpost.com/capitol-briefing/2007/06/stevens_askes_ethics_to_review.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-15-07 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why? So he can change them if the committee decides they aren't ethical?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC