Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times review of "Sicko"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 01:37 PM
Original message
NY Times review of "Sicko"
June 22, 2007
MOVIE REVIEW | 'SICKO'
Open Wide and Say ‘Shame’
By A. O. SCOTT
It has become a journalistic cliché and therefore an inevitable part of the prerelease discussion of “Sicko” to refer to Michael Moore as a controversial, polarizing figure. While that description is not necessarily wrong, it strikes me as self-fulfilling (since the controversy usually originates in media reports on how controversial Mr. Moore is) and trivial. Any filmmaker, politically outspoken or not, whose work is worth discussing will be argued about. But in Mr. Moore’s case the arguments are more often about him than about the subjects of his movies.

>
If you listen to what the leaders of both political parties are saying, it seems unlikely that the diagnosis offered by “Sicko” will be contested. I haven’t heard many speeches lately boasting about how well our health care system works. In this sense “Sicko” is the least controversial and most broadly appealing of Mr. Moore’s movies. (It is also, perhaps improbably, the funniest and the most tightly edited.) The argument it inspires will mainly be about the nature of the cure, and it is here that Mr. Moore’s contribution will be most provocative and also, therefore, most useful.

http://tinyurl.com/326els


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. After seeing Sicko earlier this week
I'm looking at presidential candidates much differently. I was leaning towards Edwards, but after seeing the film, I really don't feel good about supporting anyone who still wants to funnel money to the insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
november3rd Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He doesn't want to
He just wants to let them die on the vine, rather than re-invent them into the system.

They are the problem and are unwilling to allow a single-payer solution.

So Edwards forces them to compete with the single-payer, and the insurance companies will lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I cannot wait to see the film. I'm so exicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah, I'd like to see it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is a universal truth regarding the MCM's treatment of all liberal/progressive champions.
I would only add books and speeches to the highlighted sentence, I'm referring to.


It has become a journalistic cliché and therefore an inevitable part of the prerelease discussion of “Sicko” to refer to Michael Moore as a controversial, polarizing figure. While that description is not necessarily wrong, it strikes me as self-fulfilling (since the controversy usually originates in media reports on how controversial Mr. Moore is) and trivial. Any filmmaker, politically outspoken or not, whose work is worth discussing will be argued about. But in Mr. Moore’s case the arguments are more often about him than about the subjects of his movies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-22-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. "He finds that British doctors are happy and well paid..."
I read they are leaving the system fast and furious. I think I read that in the BBC a few weeks ago. SO are the nurses. I don't remember if the problem was low pay, work hours, or what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrs. Ted Nancy Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They seem to be well-paid
The average GP is making £106,000.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6157219.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-24-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. There was a big screw up with a central system for arranging training
Doctors call for Hewitt to resign

Junior doctors have called for Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt and Health Minister Lord Hunt to resign over "shambolic" medical training reform.

The British Medical Association's junior doctors conference called the Medical Training Application Service's problems "gross negligence".

The online job application service was suspended amid fears personal details of applicants could be accessed online.
...
The BMA estimates that 34,250 doctors are chasing 18,500 UK posts, due to start in August.

But it has warned thousands of NHS doctors could go to work abroad because of their disgust at the process.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6604531.stm


It was a new system, that was designed and introduced really badly. There are also some concerns about how hospitals are controlled - central targets versus local control, whether that local control should be democratic or appointed, and so on; but this computer system is the main issue at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC