Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A new film..., The Purple Brain, makes absurd and unsubstantiated claims of (pot) "brain damage."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 07:59 AM
Original message
A new film..., The Purple Brain, makes absurd and unsubstantiated claims of (pot) "brain damage."
Edited on Sat Jun-23-07 07:59 AM by marmar
From AlterNet:



The Purple Brain: America's New Reefer Madness

By Marsha Rosenbaum and Paul Armentano, AlterNet. Posted June 23, 2007.



A new film designed to frighten Americans about pot, The Purple Brain, makes absurd and unsubstantiated claims of "brain damage."

More than 70 years in the making, the long-awaited sequel to the notorious 1936 film, Reefer Madness has arrived. It's called The Purple Brain, and just like its unintentionally campy predecessor, its purpose is to frighten Americans about marijuana.

The particular target audience for the Feds' new production is the millions of parents who may have, without incident, experimented with marijuana in the 1970s, when they were about the same age as their children are today.

The plot is as follows: Sure, the pot you and your 40-something peers once enjoyed may have been innocuous, but that's only because it bears no resemblance to the super-potent weed of today-- strains with such foreboding names as "Train wreck," "AK-47," and "The Purple." As proclaimed by Drug Czar John Walters recently, "e are no longer talking about the drug of the 1960s and 1970s -- this is Pot 2.0."

To top off this frightening message, unsubstantiated claims of "brain damage" resulting from the use of this super-pot are new buzzwords in today's Prevention circles.

If ever there was an attention-getting script for scaring the hell out of parents, this is it.

Fortunately, while the headlines are grabbing, the story lacks credibility.

Growers in the business of selling marijuana have always attached pet names to selected strains of pot. In the 1970s, popular varieties included "Acapulco Gold" and "Maui Wowie." Today, as in the past, most of these labels are little more than clever marketing gimmicks devised by producers and sellers to distinguish their particular product in a highly competitive marketplace.

While a handful of potent strains may be available in limited quantities today, these varieties compose only a minute percentage of the overall marketplace -- at a price tag that is cost-prohibitive to anyone but the most wealthy of aficionados. For others, marijuana remains essentially the same plant it has always been, with its relatively mild rise in average potency akin to the difference between beer and wine.

Unlike alcohol -- or even aspirin, -- today's marijuana still poses no risk of fatal overdose, regardless of the strength of its primary psychoactive ingredient, THC. Moreover, cannabis consumers readily distinguish between low and high potency marijuana and moderate their use accordingly. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.alternet.org/drugreporter/54977/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. reality, some of today's weed is 1 hit, virtually instantaneous effect means that unlike alcohol...
users know whether or not they need a 2nd hit

Alcohol in contrast by the time the effect is felt the user has already ingested too much

1 hit weed costs so much, people will 1 & 2 hit it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Blueberry.... yum
I took 3 hits last night... and immediately had to lie down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Alcohol affects those parts of the brain that are associated with
the ability to make judgements, so you're right, one drink and your ability to judge whether you should have more or not is handicapped, more drinks, more handicap - and THIS is the Politically Correct drug, the Fashionable way to have have fun according to the TV. BTW, in my experience, Alcohol is a Way of Life in the Military.

I've seen this up close and personal in my family too, everything is complicated by the fact that once any kind of judgement/decision is made and acted upon, there is a strong tendency to validate it, error or not, sober or not, by means of other decisions and behaviors, in order to defend against the life-threatening implications of impaired judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm waiting for Pot 5.0.

:smoke:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-23-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Someone was just telling me about this "purple" stuff last night
at 300.00 an ounce. I declined to make a purchase, but now I might have to check it out, just so I know what my teenager might be getting into.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC