Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How the GOP Could Win (Presidency) By Richard Cohen / WaPo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:38 AM
Original message
How the GOP Could Win (Presidency) By Richard Cohen / WaPo
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/25/AR2007062501465.html?referrer=email&referrer=email&referrer=email

How the GOP Could Win

By Richard Cohen
Tuesday, June 26, 2007; A21



There are two ways to predict the winner of the 2008 presidential race: Check the polls or read some history. The polls tell you that with George Bush's approval ratings abysmally low; with the war in Iraq becoming increasingly unpopular; with the GOP lacking a dominant candidate; and with the party divided over immigration, social issues and even religion ( Mitt Romney's Mormonism), the next president is bound to be a Democrat. History begs to differ.

The history I have in mind is 1972. By the end of that year, 56,844 Americans had been killed in Vietnam, a war that almost no one thought could still be won and that no one could quite figure out how to end. Nevertheless, the winner in that year's presidential election was Richard M. Nixon. He won 49 of 50 states -- and the war, of course, went on. Just as it is hard to understand how the British ousted Winston Churchill after he had led them to victory in Europe in World War II, so it may be hard now to appreciate how Nixon won such a landslide while presiding over such a dismal war. In the first place, he was the incumbent, with all its advantages and with enormous amounts of money at his disposal. In the second place, back then the Vietnam War was not as unpopular as you might think -- or, for that matter, as the Iraq war is now. In 1972, almost 60 percent of Americans approved of the way Nixon was handling the war.

Maybe more to the point, most Americans did not endorse the way the Democrats would handle the war -- nor the way the antiwar movement was behaving. Nixon seized on those sentiments and, in a feat that historians will be challenged to explain, characterized George McGovern as something of a sissy. In fact, the Democratic presidential nominee was a genuine World War II hero, a B-24 pilot with 35 combat missions under his belt and a Distinguished Flying Cross on his chest. Nixon, in contrast, had served during the war but never saw combat. He had, however, seen the polls.

This is similar to what happened in the 2004 campaign. The Bush-Cheney ticket consisted of two Vietnam slackers. George W. Bush had served in the Air National Guard, and Dick Cheney had obtained five draft deferments. Their opponent was the much-decorated John Kerry-- Silver Star, Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts. Yet during the campaign, the Republican ticket and its allies in the Swift boat veterans movement managed to paint Kerry as a quivering liar. The character attack was so bold, so outrageous, that it of course worked....


cohenr@washpost.com



WHAT A SICK LITTLE MAN! FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU; FOOL ME TWICE---AIN'T GONNA GET FOOLED AGAIN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dickwad Dick is a sad, little man
Spreading the misogynist meme that HRC can't be an effective "commander in Chief" because she is a woman. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why is he considered a 'liberal'? He's always been a sexist. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Except for the gratuitous Hillary swipe (come on, even the GOP knows she's a tough old hawk)--
I don't disagree here. There's a danger to looking too soft/too far to the left on national security, terrorism, and the wars that may come back to bite us--you all KNOW the GOPers will play that card (it's really all they have left, besides wonderful manly smells). Why give them ammo? I fear that the vote against funding will be a big issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtanarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-26-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. "How Monkeys could fly out my butt" By thoughtanarchist / DU
It has not happened historically and the polls give no indication that it will happen, but if the stars are aligned just so it is perfectly conceivable that monkeys could indeed fly out my butt...

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC