Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Break-In That History Forgot (Head Watergate Plumber in NYT)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 05:04 PM
Original message
The Break-In That History Forgot (Head Watergate Plumber in NYT)

The Break-In That History Forgot
By EGIL KROGH
Published: June 30, 2007

Seattle

THE Watergate break-in, described by Ron Ziegler, then the White House press secretary, as a “third-rate burglary,” passes its 35th anniversary this month. The common public perception is that Watergate was the principal cause of President Nixon’s downfall. In fact, the seminal cause was a first-rate criminal conspiracy and break-in almost 10 months earlier that led inexorably to Watergate and its subsequent cover-up. ~snip~

The premise of our action was the strongly held view within certain precincts of the White House that the president and those functioning on his behalf could carry out illegal acts with impunity if they were convinced that the nation’s security demanded it. As President Nixon himself said to David Frost during an interview six years later, “When the president does it, that means it is not illegal.” To this day the implications of this statement are staggering. ~snip~

I finally realized that what had gone wrong in the Nixon White House was a meltdown in personal integrity. Without it, we failed to understand the constitutional limits on presidential power and comply with statutory law.

In early 2001, after President Bush was inaugurated, I sent the new White House staff a memo explaining the importance of never losing their personal integrity. In a section addressed specifically to the White House lawyers, I said that integrity required them to constantly ask, is it legal? And I recommended that they rely on well-established legal precedent and not some hazy, loose notion of what phrases like “national security” and “commander in chief” could be tortured into meaning. I wonder if they received my message.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/30/opinion/30krogh.html?em&ex=1183348800&en=361d60fb8fa90599&ei=5087%0A


Nixon plumber who went to prison tells story
Egil Krogh has advice for government workers: 'Never fail to ask, 'Is this right?' "

By KATHY GEORGE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER

"Ever since pleading guilty and serving a prison sentence, I have felt a growing need to convey my deep regret and apology to all Americans for my criminal actions as head of Nixon's White House plumbers."
-- from an unpublished manuscript by Egil "Bud" Krogh

~snip~ He was the first to plead guilty, and the first White House staff member to go to jail. He even insisted on being sentenced before he testified in the Watergate case, saying it would be wrong to reduce his own prison time just because he implicated others.

At the time, he told special Watergate prosecutor Leon Jaworski, "The more I've thought about it, the clearer I've seen that even though there may well have been some damaging impacts on the national security from (Daniel) Ellsberg's releasing the Pentagon Papers, those impacts simply can't justify the invasion of Fielding's rights ...

"It violates a fundamental principle in our country: the right of an individual to be protected from an unlawful action by his government." ~snip~

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/139617_plumber15.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. They paid even less attention to it
than they did Clinton's report on OBL and terrorism and what else they would be dealing with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. There are some lessons to be learned here.
But I don't see any of this current crowd as having a shred of interity or loyalty to the country or the constitution....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. EGIL Krough!!! Now there's a name from the past!!!!
And how interesting, he did the "I Vas Only Followink ORDERS" routine like so many of the GOP seem to do. He later, to his credit, came to see the light--how fascinating that he warned the BushCo White House of the potential to fall into that trap.

That second link is a wonderful character study.

Thanks for posting these--I'd forgotten about old Egil!!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I did NOT forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-30-07 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Strachan knows something...How'd he get to keep his law license
Edited on Sat Jun-30-07 07:35 PM by EVDebs
"...John Ehrlichman stated Strachan "knows a lot, that he's not telling.""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gordon_C._Strachan

Maybe someone finally followed the money and/or was another of the intelligence community's WH plants.

I haven't forgotten, either, Aquart
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tailwind Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-01-07 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
6. NeoCon=666
Watergate is just the tip of a huge iceberg.

WhiteHouse = criminality everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC