Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek: Friends in High Places ... Why Bush Gave Libby a Pass

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 09:26 AM
Original message
Newsweek: Friends in High Places ... Why Bush Gave Libby a Pass
Edited on Mon Jul-09-07 09:28 AM by RedEarth
By Michael Isikoff
Newsweek
July 16, 2007 issue - As is often the case in the Bush White House, it was a decision made swiftly, and with stealth. For weeks, allies of I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby had aggressively lobbied the president to pardon Dick Cheney's former chief of staff. Libby's powerful supporters—including major GOP fund-raisers like Florida developer Melvin Sembler, the chairman of his legal-defense trust—argued that Libby's conviction in March in the CIA leak case was a miscarriage of justice. Libby's allies pressed their argument with White House aides but got nowhere. George W. Bush's senior staff was under strict instructions: listen politely, but give away nothing about what the president might ultimately do.

Behind the scenes, Bush was intensely focused on the matter, say two White House advisers who were briefed on the deliberations, but who asked not to be identified talking about sensitive matters. Bush asked Fred Fielding, his discreet White House counsel, to collect information on the case. Fielding, anticipating the Libby issue would be on his plate, had been gathering material for some time, including key trial transcripts. Uncharacteristically, Bush himself delved into the details. He was especially keen to know if there was compelling evidence that might contradict the jury's verdict that Libby had lied to a federal grand jury about when—and from whom—he learned the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, wife of Iraq War critic Joe Wilson. But Fielding, one of the advisers tells NEWSWEEK, reluctantly concluded that the jury had reached a reasonable verdict: the evidence was strong that Libby testified falsely about his role in the leak.

The president was conflicted. He hated the idea that a loyal aide would serve time. Hanging over his deliberations was Cheney, who had said he was "very disappointed" with the jury's verdict. Cheney did not directly weigh in with Fielding, but nobody involved had any doubt where he stood. "I'm not sure Bush had a choice," says one of the advisers. "If he didn't act, it would have caused a fracture with the vice president." (White House officials and Cheney declined to comment. "As you know, we don't discuss internal deliberations," a Cheney spokeswoman tells NEWSWEEK.)

..........

In part, Bush may have stopped short of a full pardon precisely to keep Libby and other White House aides away from Democrats on Capitol Hill. Investigators in Congress are eager to call Libby to testify about the Plame case and prewar Iraq intel—an invitation Libby can continue to resist by claiming he can't talk as long as his appeal remains alive in the courts.



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19649910/site/newsweek/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. If he has been commuted, doesn't have to serve probation and didn't use his own money
to pay the fine isn't the appeal a moot point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Spin from the WH; it is evident that Libby would walk because of what
he knows and was going to expose at the trial until....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Marcy Wheeler and Spencer Ackerman were on with Sam Seder yesterday.
Marcy reeled of all the instances in which Isikoff reported the administration line or, more accurately, the Karl Rove line on issues in the Plame investigation.

She went so far as to say that Isikoff's "breaking" Richard Armitage's role in the leaks pretty much kept Rove from being prosecuted.

Ackerman defended Isikoff, saying that he had written many stories that were highly critical of the Bush administration, and saying that he had a lot of respect for Isikoff.

My own impression is that every time a revelation bubbled to the surface during the Plame investigation, Isikoff soom appeared on television and downplayed its significance.

It's not that he would refute it, so much as that he would downplay it's importance, leaving the impression that it was all just normal goings on in Our Nation's Capital.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-09-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dubya is a sock puppet
If he didn't act, it would have caused a fracture with the vice president.

Cheney is running the country. Since he claims not to be a member of the executive, that makes him a dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC