Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The FOIA Shell Game

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-13-07 06:51 AM
Original message
The FOIA Shell Game
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/newspaperbeat_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003610568

The FOIA Shell Game

In December 2005, President Bush directed federal agencies to speed up their response to requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by appointing chief FOIA officers and adopting concrete timelines and fulfillment goals. In the time since, those goals have not been met -- although U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales would have you believe otherwise.

By Mark Fitzgerald

CHICAGO (July 11, 2007) -- For advocates of government transparency —and, as election after election shows, that means the overwhelming majority of Americans — Dec. 14, 2005, brought an unexpected early Christmas gift from a Bush White House that has a devotion to secrecy rivaled only by the Illuminati. In an executive order larded with enough rhetoric about openness to make the folks at the National Freedom of Information Coalition blush, President George W. Bush on that day directed federal agencies to speed up their response to requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by appointing chief FOIA officers and adopting concrete timelines and fulfillment goals.

Eighteen months later, we've gotten our second report from U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on how the 92 federal agencies are doing — and boy, it seems those bureaucrats are really hopping to it. "Overall, federal agencies made diligent and measurable progress in implementing the executive order during this first reporting period, which represents only a little more than seven months of activity under the FOIA Improvement Plans," Gonzales reports. More than half of the agencies — 54 of them! — actually met their mostly modest milestone goals on time, he exults.

Now, if my youngest kid brought home a report card from St. Thecla Elementary School with a mark of 59, the next time he touched his PlayStation controls he'd have to wipe away the cobwebs. But this is government work, after all, and Gonzales assures us that this White House and its agencies are making Progress toward citizen-centered and results-oriented FOIA practices. And if we can't believe Gonzales — he of the torture memos, Patriot Act wiretapping greenlights, and political hiring and mass firing of federal prosecutors — then the terrorists have won. Or something.

Maybe he was distracted preparing for testimony before Congress, but our attorney general couldn't make even his own "progress" report sound much like progress.

As the invaluable Coalition of Journalists for Open Government noted in its analysis of the report, the very first example of an agency really getting on the stick is Housing and Urban Development (HUD), which Gonzales hailed for taking "the challenge of backlog reduction seriously." So what, specifically, had HUD done? It issued a memo on dealing with backlogs. Meanwhile, as the coalition notes, HUD's actual backlog rose 33% in 2006, beginning the year with 3,725 unprocessed requests and ending it with 4,951.

snip//

But as E&P goes to press there still has been no vote on the measure, because Sen. John Kyl (R-Ariz.) put a secret hold on it. When Kyl's opposition was outed by a Wiki-journalism effort led by the Society of Professional Journalists, he explained that he was blocking it because the Justice Department told him it had "uncharacteristically strong" objections to the law. So the same Alberto Gonzales who is trying to sell a rosy picture of a White House intent on making FOIA more accessible is sabotaging the very law that would accomplish that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC