Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paybacks is a .........BITCH !! GOP is running scared.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:50 AM
Original message
Paybacks is a .........BITCH !! GOP is running scared.
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 07:54 AM by Fluffdaddy
This is a Nice read. Heads-up though, this is a Robert Novak Article so for those that don't like to read what the other-side is thinking and writing Please.........Move on. But I think this articles shows that the GOP is running scared. Payback, I just love it so :)


"Henry Waxman planned payback through 12 years in the minority."


Democrats' Payback Time

WASHINGTON — Mid-term elections 13 days earlier had been disastrous for Republicans, but Sara Taylor on Nov. 20, 2006, gushed in her thank you message to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. The 32-year-old White House political director praised drug czar John Walters and his deputies for attending 20 campaign events for vulnerable Republican members of Congress. On Friday this week, Taylor as a private citizen will testify under oath about the propriety of this political activity.

Since she resigned her White House post in May, Taylor has been the target of Democratic committee chairmen. On July 11, she stumbled through interrogation by Chairman Patrick Leahy's Senate Judiciary Committee about political motives in dismissing U.S. attorneys. She had hardly recovered from that ordeal when she received a July 17 letter from House Oversight Committee Chairman Henry Waxman requesting "voluntary" testimony on "politicization" of the Drug Control Office. Under an agreement negotiated by her attorney, Taylor will be deposed Friday in preparation for open testimony, perhaps next Monday.

Taylor has been the most obvious target of a grand inquisition, but she is small game. The Democrats are after her former boss, senior presidential adviser Karl Rove, and beyond him, George W. Bush, whom they consider an illegitimate president. At a staff level, it is simply payback time for Democrats who remember Rep. Dan Burton, who in chairing the committee Waxman now heads sought e-mails revealing illegal foreign political contributions.

Waxman intends to question Taylor about a post-election meeting presided over by Rove described in a Nov. 21 e-mail to Walters and his deputies from Douglas Simon, the drug office's liaison with the White House. Simon wrote that Rove "specifically thanked, for going beyond the call of duty, the Dept. of Commerce, Transportation, Agriculture AND the WH Drug Policy Office. This recognition is not something we hear every day, and we should feel confident that our hard work is noticed. . . . Director Walters and the Deputies covered thousands of miles .
. . and had to give up time with their families for the godawful places we sent them."

Noting that these "godawful places" were constituencies of vulnerable Republicans in Congress, Waxman asked for Taylor's testimony on "the use of taxpayer-funded travel" by the drug czar "to help Republican candidates for office."

Waxman's complaint of a politicized drug office is enhanced by Simon's description of Rove after the election: "Karl also launched into a feisty discussion about plans for the final two years of this administration. In no uncertain terms, he said he is not going to let the last quarter of this presidency be dictated by Capitol Hill."

Waxman concedes he sounds like the French police inspector in the movie "Casablanca" who was "shocked" to discover gambling. "I recognize that federal political appointees have traveled to events with members of Congress in prior administrations," he wrote Taylor. "What is striking about your memo to is the degree of White House control, the number of trips and the agency involved." He claimed a "tradition of non-partisanship" in an office where the first drug czar was William J. Bennett.

Waxman's multiple inquiries wage all-out war against Bush. He has accused Lurita Doan, administrator of the General Services of Administration, of soliciting political activity by her employees. He heard testimony from former Surgeon General Richard Carmona that the White House politicized his work. Waxman also has said he plans to revisit what Taylor knows about the sacking of U.S. attorneys.

Henry Waxman planned payback through 12 years in the minority. In response, the Oversight Committee's ranking Republican, Rep. Tom Davis, in a April 25 committee meeting tried to extend Waxman's subpoena of Republican e-mails to include Democratic e-mails during the Clinton administration. Davis was rejected on a party-line vote.

The White House is feckless. Once off the government payroll, Sara Taylor was on her own to explain a world she never built. While the president ordered his former counsel Harriet Miers not to testify about firing U.S. attorneys, Taylor was given ambiguous instructions on what she could and could not discuss. Now, she faces the need to defend under oath the politics of the Drug Control office.

http://www.creators.com/opinion/robert-novak/democrats-payback-time.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope they *ALL* run right off the cliff like the little lemmings
they all are...... AND they can take Lieberman with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah.........
We got 'em right where we want 'em.... :sarcasm:


More like, we got 'em right where they they want us. Sorry, but true. All these Republicans-on-the-run articles are just a bunch of obfiscation to shut the Democratis rank and file up long enough to let the Bush administration finsih their job.

This is a "beast" that we will have to kill, not with our bare hands, but with a stake through the heart or with a silver bullet. So far, none of our elected Democrats have appeared to be carrying either.

It's all a sham.


TC



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. What, you mean to tell me you get no enjoyment in seeing
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 08:31 AM by Fluffdaddy
The Democrats hold the GOP feet to the fire for the first time in 8 years?

For 8 yeas the GOP congress have been blocking every investigation of dirty deeds the WH and Rove been pulling.

My Grandma once told me "What's done in the dark will come out in the light" Well the Democrats are holding the flashlight now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Novak is obviously no longer on the WH payroll. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. He just tosses out the line that Waxman has been planning payback for 12 years
without any evidence or even anecdotes to back it up. Most of the Republicans in power right now cannot grasp that anyone would be searching for truth or trying to stop abuses of power for any other reason than "payback".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. True. But there's nothing wrong in Payback being the motivation in
doing the right thing :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. "...whom they consider an illegitimate president."
Correction: "...whom we KNOW is an illegitimate president."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bravo Zulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Novakula gives me the creeps
He/it looks like death sneaking over a cemetery fence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beltanefauve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Novakula sucks
Waxman is depicted as a ruthless revenge-seeker,(for Dan Burton twelve years ago? Pleeeze!) and little Sara Taylor is a victim of an "inquisition", all the while the American public grows weary of "scandal fatigue". Uh, it's called, "accountibility", and "checks and balances", Bob.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. If that were true
that Dems spend years plotting revenge and intrigue then simply, Novak would be in jail now. Or he would be, as he knows it eventually, and he would be acting a lot more polite to these awful, vengeful schemers.

Novak is indeed one of those characters who is all lie all the time. Unfortunately, we can believe the opposite, and not much ruthless foresight has been building up all these years. or else they never would have been so had on the gross hypocrisy of the filibuster monopoly of the GOP. The real malicious plan is the one biting the GOP and Mr. Novak on their soiled tail- their own coming back at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC