Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Scher: Standing Up To The Obstructionists (And The Pundits Who Love Them)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:40 PM
Original message
Bill Scher: Standing Up To The Obstructionists (And The Pundits Who Love Them)
From OurFuture.org:


Submitted by Bill Scher on July 26, 2007 - 11:14am.

The blogosphere is abuzz this morning after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid took to task the Washington Post editorial board, in the paper's own pages. (DailyKos, Eschaton, TPMCafe, D-Day, Skewering The Chimp and Slow Roasted have praised Reid's letter to the editor.)

Last week, The Posties accused Reid of being "irresponsible" for "deny rather than nourish a bipartisan agreement" on Iraq:

The Senate Democratic leadership spent the past week trying to prove that Congress is deeply divided over Iraq, with Democrats pressing and Republicans resisting a change of course. In fact that's far from the truth. A large majority of senators from both parties favor a shift in the U.S. mission that would involve substantially reducing the number of American forces over the next year or so and rededicating those remaining to training the Iraqi army, protecting Iraq's borders and fighting al-Qaeda. President Bush and his senior aides and generals also support this broad strategy...

Putting aside the laughable claim that Bush wants to fundamentally change course in Iraq, what's also "far from the truth" is that a "large majority" of Republican Senators want the same.

This fiction was concocted earlier in the month by conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks. The Post merely recycled the baseless assertion as fact, without any evidence.

If it actually was true, a majority of Republicans would have voted for the legislation Reid put on the floor, as the bill proposed all the strategic shifts listed above by the Post.

As they say, the Post has a right to its opinion, but not to its own facts.

Reid himself effectively laid out the facts in his letter. Clearly, Reid realizes that pressure can't be easily placed on the obstructionists if the traditional media won't tell the truth about who is obstructing the public will. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/standing_obstructionists_and_pundits_who_love_them?tx=3


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC