Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Centrists Didn’t Hold - DLC - NY Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:00 AM
Original message
The Centrists Didn’t Hold - DLC - NY Times
By NOAM SCHEIBER
Published: July 28, 2007 - NY Times

NOT very long ago, the Democratic Leadership Council was a maker of presidents — or, at least, the maker of a president. In 1991, Gov. Bill Clinton of Arkansas, then the council’s chairman, elucidated the “New Democrat” ethos and previewed the themes of his presidential candidacy (“opportunity, responsibility, community”) with a speech at the centrist group’s annual conference. “It became the blueprint for my campaign message,” Mr. Clinton later wrote in his autobiography. He added, “By embracing ideas and values that were both liberal and conservative, it made voters who had not supported Democratic presidential candidates in years listen to our message.”

But few headlines will be made this weekend at the council’s “National Conversation” in Nashville. The next president of the United States almost certainly won’t be there. Not only are Democratic front-runners like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama planning to skip the conference, but so are the Bill Richardsons and Chris Dodds of the field. That’s probably a good move for the candidates, as the council has become radioactive among Democratic primary voters. But the Democratic Leadership Council’s fading influence is also good news for the entire party.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/28/opinion/28scheiber.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think all the centrists have gone to Unity08
which is trying to literally forge a ticket with a Republic and a Democrat on it.

I think another reason Democrats are avoiding the DLC are its perceived ties to corporations--Clinton getting NAFTA passed has always been something I felt benefited the corporations rather than the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Don't Forget Permanent 'Free' Trade With China
Another DLC gift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Just like 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. The writer is Senior Ediitor at The New Republic - following is one
paragraph from Wikipedia for TNR - as an fyi:

"Domestically, the current version of TNR supports social liberalism with a largely centrist stance on fiscal issues and a left-wing stance of social issues. The magazine's outlook was first associated with the Democratic Leadership Council and "New Democrats" like former President Bill Clinton and Connecticut Senator Joseph Lieberman, who received the magazine's endorsement in the 2004 Democratic primary. These policies, while seeking to achieve the ends of traditional social welfare programs, often use market solutions as their means, and so are often called "business-friendly". Typical of some of the policies supported by both TNR and the DLC during the 1990s were increased funding for the Earned Income Tax Credit program and reform of the Federal welfare system. On social issues, TNR is further to the left. Its support of same-sex marriage, for example, is generally considered left of the Democratic Party. In its March 2007 issue, The New Republic ran an article by Paul Starr (co-funder of the magazine's main rival, The American Prospect) where he defined the type of modern American liberalism in his article War and Liberalism: ... "

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Uh, Duh, that's because they were never centrists
but were far to the right of the party rank and file. They did a damned good job of alienating the party base, though, and getting the GOP in for far too many terms.

I'm glad the party is finally waking up. Now if only we can get a president who hasn't been sealed inside the DC bubble for the past few years, maybe we'll get back on track and on message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There is more to winning elections, than appealing to the base
I am quite happy that centrism has lost much of its appeal but there is no denying it was a valid strategy for the times when it arose. Basically you have the causes and effects completely upside down and backwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No party that ignores its base can win elections
That's just a fact of life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No party can win
if its base ignores reality either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Really? The GOP won all 3 branches by appealing to its base
and one can argue that the GOP base is not reality based in its philosophy.

Again, ignoring the party base led to the Democrats being shut out of all 3 branches of government. I don't want to see that happen, ever again, despite what party conservatives want.

I'm glad the power of conservatives within the party is starting to wane. It needed to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. reality changes.
I cannot think for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Reality is what it is.
Conservatives are the ones trying to change reality to fit their conservative ideologies, and it never works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. last thought on this
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 10:03 PM by Jim4Wes
How exactly did a self professed moderate (centrist) win the Democratic nomination in '92 anyway. How does that fit into your version of reality? Seriously, I have no more interest in this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. The last sentence is exactly what I wrote in a DU thread four years
Edited on Sat Jul-28-07 11:28 AM by higher class
ago - during the 2004 primaries - NO LONGER NEEDED - did you hear that Senators Clinton, Dodd, and Biden?

"Democrats should thank the group and then tell it that it’s no longer needed."

Thank you NYT and TNR Senior Editor Scheiber!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. The message is the massage. Relax. Feel good. Don't think of consequences.
Global corporate predators will take care of you.

“By embracing ideas and values that were both liberal and conservative, it made voters who had not supported Democratic presidential candidates in years listen to our message.” --Bill Clinton

And don't bother with the fine print. We'll read it FOR you. Rest your eyes. Don't worry. It'll make some of you rich. You may be "the one." There's a lottery ticket waiting just for you. And the peons, and the slave labor, and the cannon fodder, what do they really matter? America, per se, is over. Get used to it. Move along, nothing to see here. War profiteering corporate news monopolies? That's just the "free market" at work. It's a good thing. Hey, look at this new widget--electronic voting! Another bubbly thing. But don't y'all fret about it. We know what's best. Go to sleep, in your mud wrap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-28-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. When I want a Pepsi, I get the real thing, not a Diet Pepsi
If given the choice between a Republican and a Democrat who talks and acts like a Republican-lite, they will choose the real thing every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC