Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's look at what the Dems who voted for the Bush's spying bill are sacrificing our liberties for.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:19 AM
Original message
Let's look at what the Dems who voted for the Bush's spying bill are sacrificing our liberties for.
from OurFuture.org:



Gimme Some Truth
Submitted by Rick Perlstein on August 6, 2007 - 3:45pm.


Thete is a fascinating AP article about the random combination of circumstances that led to a small group of civil rights lawyers getting a glimpse at the quality of the evidence the post-9/11 National Security State uses to choose its targets for warrantless eavesdropping.

Attorney Jon Eisenberg accidentally got to see a National Security Administration log of calls intercepted between an Islamic charity and its American lawyers, stamped TOP SECRET on every page. It's now stored in a bombproof safe in Washington and viewed only by prosecutors with top secret security clearances and a few select federal judges. It is also, Eisenberg says, relying upon his memory—there isn't allowed be any written record of the Document's contents, and even the laptop Erenberg used to write briefs for the case is scheduled to be erased—a joke. "Believe me," Eisenberg says, with what I can only imagine to be a bemused but weary sigh, "if this appeared on the front pages of newspapers, national security would not be jeopardized."

That's not hard to believe. The government's "case" against supposed "dirty bomber" Jose Padilla has been such an embarrassment—the feds have 300,000 taped phone calls, only 21 of which refer to Padilla, and the claim is that on those 21 calls, phrases like “playing football”, “eating cheese” and “zucchini” are supposed to refer to his Dr. Evil-like plots—that the defense attorneys have decided not even to dignify them with a response, resting their case without calling a single witness.

There will come a time, decades hence, when we learn more about the tragicomic incompetents and blackguards among those who affect to be our brave anti-terrorist watchmen; you can only erase so many hard drives and so many consciences. Look what happened when FOIA requests and archival digging starting turning documents of the work of our Keystone anti-Kommunist Kops in a previous generation.

The FBI and CIA went after one enemy of America with particular gusto, as an indefatigable historian learned after years of dogged work getting his security file released. J. Edgar Hoover personally classified his case as a "Security Matter"—the designation reserved for those considered potentially violently dangerous to internal security. They were so determined to neutralize this anti-American that they persisted even after an FBI source advised that the subject "appears to be radically oriented however he does not give the impression he is a true revolutionist since he is constantly under the influence of narcotics."

The subject was, yes, John Lennon—or as the FBI called him, "Lennon formerly with the group known as the Beatles." .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://commonsense.ourfuture.org/gimme_some_truth?tx=3


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. And look at those that voted for it. ALL the southern states
and a few midwest. ALL RED STATES. Whose candidates switched to democrat at the last minute to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC