Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democratic Support Variences for Clinton in Red and Blue States Statistically Insignificant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-08-07 10:42 AM
Original message
Democratic Support Variences for Clinton in Red and Blue States Statistically Insignificant
OpEdNews

Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_david_te_070808_democratic_support_f.htm


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
August 8, 2007

Democratic Support for Hillary Clinton Among Red and Blue States is Statistically Insignificant

By David Terr


Using data from 33 out of 51 states (including Washington, DC) on support among Democratic voters and leaners for Hillary Clinton, we have found that her support among the "blue" states (states in which Bush lost in the 2004 Presidential election) is slightly higher than in the "red" states (states in which Bush won), but this difference could easily be due to statistical uncertainty. 17 of the states we looked at were red and 16 were blue. Hillary's average support among democrats is 32.8% in the red states and 35.0% in the blue states. Her highest support among Democrats for red states is 49%, for her home state of Arkansas and for blue states is 48%, for New York, where she is currently residing. Her lowest support among Democrats for red states is 20%, for North Carolina, where John Edwards is in the lead and for blue states is 28%, for Connecticut.



Specifically we found that her average support among the "blue" states (averaged by state) is 35.0%, with an uncertainty (standard deviation of the mean) of 1.6%, whereas among the "red" states it is 32.8% with an uncertainty of 1.3%. Thus, the difference is 2.2% with an uncertainty of 2.1%. The standard score (z-value) of the difference is thus 1.05, which turns out to correspond to a probability of 29% that this difference is due to statistical uncertainty. The cutoff which is usually used is z=2, corresponding to a probability of 5%. Thus, we conclude that the difference is statistically insignificant.



For more information on the data, please go to Hillary Red and Blue State Analysis Data.





Authors Website: www.presidentpolls2008.com

Authors Bio: My name is David Terr. I have a Ph.D. in mathematics from UC Berkeley and I currently work as a web designer. I am the co-owner of three websites: presidentpolls2008.com, usatravelpal.com, and yourmoviepal.com. My homepage is davidterr.com. Besides math, I'm interested in politics, music, movies, philosophy, religion, and science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC