Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A real bad ID law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:58 AM
Original message
A real bad ID law
A real bad ID law
Globe Editorial
August 12, 2007


STATES ARE rebelling against the federal government over the Real ID law, which calls for states to develop highly secure drivers licenses and identity cards. The licenses and cards are meant to thwart terrorism and fraud by definitively proving that people are who they claim to be.

Instead, the 2005 law makes a promise of safety that's too good to be true, not least because the measure glosses over complicated technological problems that make its requirements difficult to implement. Congress should repeal the Real ID law and work with states to devise a better approach.

State officials damn the law for a variety of reasons. A common complaint is that Real ID is an unfunded mandate. States could face costs of more than $11 billion over five years, according to a survey of motor vehicle agencies that was jointly done by the National Conference of State Legislatures, the National Governors Association, and the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators.

The law also may represent a threat to privacy. It calls for a linked system of state databases, which some state legislators say would be a "picnic" for identity thieves.

Some officials even maintain that the law violates the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution. The Constitution does not expressly let the federal government issue driver's licenses, so that power, they maintain, should be reserved for the states.

A showdown is looming. If the Real ID law stands, residents of states that refuse to comply wouldn't be able to use their driver's licenses as identification to engage in federally regulated activities, such as boarding airplanes or entering a federal court house. The law sets a deadline of May 11, 2008, though states could apply for a five-year extension.


more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. So much for small government
Edited on Sun Aug-12-07 09:36 AM by jimshoes
How can the same people who espouse the small government line, willingly acquiesce to an ever more pervasive and intrusive government presence in almost every daily activity? Don't their head's hurt trying to fit two opposing viewpoints into the same tightly closed space?
ed:gr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC