Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Independent UK: Tensions rise after three British soldiers killed in US airstrike

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:11 PM
Original message
Independent UK: Tensions rise after three British soldiers killed in US airstrike
Tensions rise after three British soldiers killed in US airstrike
By Kim Sengupta
Published: 25 August 2007


Three British soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan in a "friendly fire" attack by American aircraft while involved in a clash with Taliban fighters.

The deaths brought the number of British forces killed in action in the country to 50, and came at the end of a week which had exposed rifts between American and British forces.

The fatal incident, a "blue on blue" in military terms, took place at Kajaki in Helmand province, where British troops are trying to create a safety zone around a dam which would enable an American company to start repair work.

A British patrol called in air strikes after coming under fire from the Taliban and were then bombed by mistake by American F-15 aircraft which came in support. The three soldiers died at the scene, while two others who were injured, one described as "seriously" and the other "very seriously", were evacuated for treatment to the British base, Camp Bastion. All the casualties are from 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, which has now lost nine men during its tour of duty.

Tensions between US and British forces have risen after the American General Jack Keene, an advisor to the White House, scathingly criticised British policy in Iraq. There have also been disagreements in Afghanistan after the decision by the US Nato commander in the country, General Dan McNeill, to abort agreements made by British forces with local leaders in Helmand.

Mounting Afghan anger over civilian deaths caused by US air strikes had reportedly led to senior British officers asking the Americans not to continue a military operation, separate from the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) mission, in British-controlled areas. However, British military sources stressed yesterday that the latest friendly fire deaths took place within Isaf operations and the American aircraft, part of a Nato "pool" providing air cover, were responding to British pleas for help. Both the British and US authorities will hold boards of inquiry into the deaths on Thursday. .....(more)

The complete piece is at: http://news.independent.co.uk/world/asia/article2893882.ece



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hieronymus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did Bush order it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-24-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Independent is pro-EU
Edited on Fri Aug-24-07 11:31 PM by melody
They're normally going to play up differences between the UK and US. That's their whole
objective. Why ANYONE is dying is the question. The EU's complicit silence and financial
gains while clucking their tongue only feeds the problem while also being brazenly hypocritical. Their hierarchy is as deeply mired in this as the power wielders in the US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. In the UK we have few choices for the future
We can either become a US dependent territory or we can be a part of the EU. While I admire the US, I believe that we will maintain more of our freedom as part of the EU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-25-07 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I don't think either road is what you need to do
I certainly don't think there are only two choices. Knowing what I know about the
EU, I can assure you that you'd be just as bullied and intimidated there as you are
with the US. The EU has global ambitions just as the US has. If it were not for the
fact our local globalists are planning on smashing all of North America into one country,
I'd even be concerned about a US/EU war at some point in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC