Bush Attacks Greeneland

[Swede]

Some say the best way to win a debate is to invent a straw man on the other side, and then refute the crazy things they never said. I say those people are wrong.

The problem isn't using the occasional fictitious opponent in an argument; the problem is that's all President Bush ever does. They're his one great rhetorical "go to." Right after lies.

You could waste a lot of time, after a typical Bush speech, trying to find the imaginary people who believe the things he strongly doesn't. The liberals who loved Saddam Hussein, the racists who don't like "No Child Left Behind," the Democrats who said the answer to 9/11 was therapy, the women who wish there were more late term abortions.

Where does the President meet these people?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/20070825/cm_huffpost/061809

[madeline_con]

1. Chris Kelly will soon be on the list of...

writers to ignore. Hilarious. :rofl:

[twenty4blackbirds]

2. misread it as "Bush attacks Greenland"...

and it didn't sound outrageous :-(