Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush’s Deadly Certainties (worth reading this Review and passing around)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 07:53 AM
Original message
Bush’s Deadly Certainties (worth reading this Review and passing around)


http://pierretristam.com/blog/index.php/?cat=1

> September 5, 2007
> Bush’s Deadly Certainties

>
>
> In his book “Dead Certainties, Unwarranted Speculations” from back in 1992, the unconventional historian Simon Schama explored the gulf between the “lived event and its subsequent narration.” The two can be vastly different, depending on the quality of your spin-meister. In his book “Dead Certainty,” an extended profile of George W. Bush, Robert Draper paints the picture of a president given dangerously and entirely to reinventing everything, but absolutely everything, in his image, however divorced from reality. As Michiko Kakutani writes in the Times,
>
> It is a portrait of the commander in chief as a willful optimist, proud of his self-confidence and convinced that any expressions of doubt would make him less of a leader: a man addicted to “Big Ideas and small comforts” (like riding his bike), a stubborn, even obstinate politician loath to change course or second-guess himself, and given to valuing loyalty above almost everything else.
>
> The result: a presidency at the improv, the improv being the seat of Bush’s pants, themselves a crease away from his guts. We find out along the way the astounding revelation that John Roberts, the chief justice, was actually the one who suggested Harriet Miers as a Supreme Court nominee,m which gives you an idea of the shallowness lurking beneath those baby blues of Roberts’s (whether he has blue eyes or not is irrelevant: he packaged himself, in his confirmation hearings, as a baby-blue boy. It worked, obviously). Further:
>
> This is a president who says he cries easily and often about dead and wounded soldiers, a president who Mr. Draper says doesn’t defer, as widely believed, to Vice President Cheney and Mr. Rove (who apparently recommended that Mr. Cheney not be put on the 2000 ticket, arguing, in Mr. Draper’s words, that picking “Daddy’s top foreign-policy guy ran counter to message.”) Mr. Draper tells us that the president repeated his conviction that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction to his chief of staff, Andrew H. Card Jr., “all the way up until Card’s departure in April 2006, almost exactly three years after the Coalition had begun its fruitless search for WMD’s.”........
>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC