Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attracting Young Voters with Debt Relief

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:12 PM
Original message
Attracting Young Voters with Debt Relief

The sub-prime mortgage scandal is only part of the debt problem in the United States. The issue is likely to attract the attention of young voters this election cycle, which may be the key to bringing about change.

Anya Kamenetz | September 17, 2007 | web only
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=attracting_young_voters_with_debt_relief

Debt is the new four-letter word. As the credit-fueled housing bubble comes ever closer to bursting, Democrats in Congress and on the stump are denouncing predatory lenders and their "Wild West" ways. The potential industry blowback extends far beyond NINJA (no income, no job, no assets) mortgages and "liar loans." A whole new debt-industrial complex -- high-interest payday loans, deceptive credit card practices, creditor-friendly bankruptcy laws, and an oversubsidized student loan business -- is undermining Americans' economic security.

Access to capital through flexible, fair credit lets responsible people make needed investments, whether in a home, a new business or a college degree. Overabundant, high-priced, high-pressure credit turns good investments into unacceptable risks. We need to restore that ugly word usury to describe some of the prevalent lending practices of today, along with the principle that creditors share a responsibility with borrowers. Halting abuses like 500 percent interest on payday loans and universal default on credit cards (where one late payment is enough to raise interest rates on all your cards) won't be enough to restore the listing foundation of middle and working class economic security, but it will at least reduce the insult of exploitation added to the injury of inequality.

The looming question is what will happen to our consumption-fueled, flat-wage economy when the leaky faucet of easy credit is finally tightened. Recession, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and abandoned educational dreams are all on the menu of possibilities. Credit card delinquencies are up because people are finding it harder to use their home equity to pay off debt, and an increase in the bankruptcy rate may follow.

Perversely, people with poor credit are apparently targeted with more credit card solicitations than the squeaky-clean. High interest rates, penalties and fees are so lucrative that the industry has an incentive to seek out borrowers who are more likely to get in trouble. According to a study by Mintel International Group, cited in the Boston Globe, "Direct-mail solicitations to subprime borrowers were 41 percent higher in the first six months of 2007 than they were in the first half of 2006. At the same time, solicitations to the most credit-worthy consumers fell by 13 percent." Similarly, a recent survey by the Consumer Bankruptcy Project showed that families reported receiving an average of more than fourteen credit offers per month one year post-bankruptcy -- compared to just six offers per month for the average American.

Voters will likely have something to say about the need for debt reform in the upcoming election. And one surprising -- and surprisingly important -- group attracted to the message of economic security is young people. Kat Barr of Young Voter Strategies, a research firm that recently merged with Rock the Vote says their polling since 2006 shows strong economic concerns among young people. "Education and college affordability were always really high up there among the things young people wanted Congress to take care of," she says. "We also saw all of the cluster of economic issues that are financial-security related—jobs, the economy, health care."

By 2008, those aged 18 to 31 will outnumber the Baby Boomers. This age group has higher proportions of ethnic minorities and immigrants and skews heavily Democratic. Though still lagging behind older cohorts, youth voting rates rose in both 2004 and 2006, and summer polls suggest that young people are following this election even more closely than the last. In the most recent national young voter poll, by Democracy Corps, voters 18 to 31 in all income brackets far preferred Clinton, Obama, and generic Democrats on every issue. And echoing the Young Voter Strategies polling, they continue to place emphasis on the importance of economic issues. Thirty-nine percent volunteered "the economy" when asked for the leading issue facing the nation, beating all other contenders (Iraq scored only 19 percent.) Fifty-eight percent of young people said they were "one paycheck away from having to borrow money from their parents or credit cards," two-thirds were working for an hourly wage and 60 percent were worried about their own debt.

The Democratic presidential candidates are all talking about debt, opportunity, and restoring the American dream, and young voters are listening. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have proposals to limit mortgage foreclosures, tighten lending rules, and clean up student loans. Barr points out that all three Democratic front-runners have already hired youth outreach directors and staff, whereas in 2004, Kerry and Bush let it wait until after the nomination. (The Republican front-runners have not been as fast on youth outreach, though Mitt Romney's son did start a fundraising campaign for college students.) Obama, who hired Rock the Vote's political director and Facebook's co-founder to help with youth and online strategy, has the best youth organization, with a lively Students for Obama blog, a Generation Obama campaign to reach the non-college majority, and not surprisingly, a million-member Facebook group.

Clinton, whose support is much higher among non-college youth according to a spring Harvard Institute of Politics poll (Obama shows much the opposite) has what she calls a "youth opportunity agenda," for once she is in office, including a few hundred million for summer internships, job programs, and support for local efforts to track and re-engage high school dropouts (the term of art is "disconnected youth.")

Edwards, who has made economic populism key to his campaign, has the most extensive debt plan. He gets the idea of a debt-industrial complex, talking about a credit "sneak attack" on the middle class. Edwards would ban payday lending, limit certain credit card charges, and create a new unified regulatory commission with broader powers to police all types of consumer credit. The first in his family to go to college, Edwards would cut bank subsidies entirely from the student loan program and extend a program he calls "College For Everyone." Based on a pilot program he started in Snow Hill, North Carolina, it would pay for four years of public university tuition, fees, and books in return for students earning good grades, working part-time and staying out of trouble.

The good news for younger debtors is that in the arena of college debt, an important principle of fairness has just been established. In early September, Congress cut almost $21 billion in excessive subsidies to banks from the student loan program, and President Bush has pledged to sign the bill. The money will be used to increase need-based grants, expand loan forgiveness programs, and to lower the cost of loans. Most importantly, a new provision called Fair Payment Assurance will allow all student loan borrowers to limit their repayments to a percentage of income, preventing anyone from sinking below the poverty line or otherwise being unduly burdened by student loans.

Although "youth issues" are often stereotyped as social ones, the Millennial generation will likely be voting their pocketbooks. The student loan reforms just passed by Congress have shown what can be done to comprehensively remedy one form of outsized debt. If the Democratic candidates are serious about targeting the youth vote, this type of reform will be the first of many.
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=attracting_young_voters_with_debt_relief

Anya Kamenetz has written for the New York Times, the Washington Post, New York Magazine, Salon, Slate, The Nation, and the Village Voice. She is the author of Generation Debt: Why Now is a Terrible Time to be Young (Riverhead Books, 2006).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I thought this would be about student loan debt relief.
If Democrats really want to attract young voters and parents of college age kids they should start talking about more student aid and student loan debt relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Or actually funding higher education and forcing certain colleges to stop treating higher education
like a business. Non-private colleges that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The problem with a lot of student debt
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 01:38 PM by midlife_mo_Jo
is that it should never have been borrowed in the first place.

When I was growing up, a university education wasn't as expensive as it is now, and yet we were much more cautious about the amount of debt we took on. All of my siblings and I went to a local university. We lived at home for a year or two, until we were in a position to rent an apartment with friends.

I look at my kids' friends, and they all intend to go away to college and assume lots of debt, sometimes even passing on a better, more well-known program right here in our city. Schools know that most students don't care about the price tag, so there's very little incentive to keep the cost down.

This is madness, and needs to stop, imo. It's ridiculous to start off independent life with a massive amounts of debt to become a teacher, for instance. Doesn't anyone counsel these kids on what their lives will be like with that much debt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So educational choices are only for the rich?
Maybe this is socialist but I don't like that idea. The problem is that so many schools are so expensive, not that middle class students want the freedom to attend the school of their choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is what it is
Edited on Mon Sep-17-07 02:44 PM by midlife_mo_Jo
Right now, we have to pay for higher education. That's just the way it is.

Frankly, I'm not crazy about using taxes for student tuition so kids can party for four years or six or eight.... until they finally choose a major. With our lower educaton system in a shambles, public housing in a shambles, a health care system that is an absolutely disgrace, funding a bunch of students who don't even know what they want to major in just isn't a high priority for me. If a student wants to move five states away to get a teaching degree and a $75,000 debt, paying for that doesn't seem like a good investment in tax money until we fix a lot of other things.

What kind of system should we have? I don't know, but it would be nice if maybe the government could help fund upper level university classes - like junior and senior classes towards a dedicated major. It's hard to say what kind of changes we should make, though. In many countries with free college tuition, it's harder to get in, and kids tend to get tracked earlier in life, so choices are automatically limited. I would hate to see that happen here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. The credit card industry is the other shoe of the sub-prime market.
People will use up all available credit in an attempt to keep family and home together. When all the cards are maxed out and they go into foreclosure anyway the card issuers will bump interest rates to the max 30%. When that happens there will be no way to make the increased payments on unsecured debt. There's gonna be a lot of people just walk away from their CC debt because of the new bankruptcy law.

It's gonna get ugly out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-17-07 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I agree with you - Dr. Who!
It's going to get REAL ugly out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC