Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SOTU: A Reactive Tone Shows His Ears Have Been Burning (WP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:48 AM
Original message
SOTU: A Reactive Tone Shows His Ears Have Been Burning (WP)
A Reactive Tone Shows His Ears Have Been Burning

By David Von Drehle
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, January 21, 2004; Page A01


President Bush's State of the Union speech showed just how closely he and his staff have been following the fight for the Democratic presidential nomination, and how conscious they are of the opposition's emerging campaign themes 10 long months before Election Day.

From Iraq to taxes, from the USA Patriot Act to school funding, from foreign policy to deficit spending, Bush responded to criticisms that his would-be challengers are still working to formulate. Sometimes, incumbents act as if they have not heard what their critics are saying about them. Bush's father, for example, seemed not to register Bill Clinton's attacks on his economic policies until fairly late in the 1992 campaign.

Clearly, the current president's ears have been burning




http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A33233-2004Jan20.html?nav=hptop_tb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. I really thought we'd see a "kinder and gentler" GWB last night.
I thought we'd see him offering olive branches and whispering sweet nothings to the middle. I figured he and his Republican cheerleaders would have spent lots of words telling us how he was going to help the American people....then, of course, do precisely the opposite in legislation.

Instead, he sharpens the RW rhetoric. At least we should understand that he means to make good on the Republican "vision" for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wabeewoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep!
I thought he had something for everyone to HATE! If he barely won ( I know-he didn't ) how can he even come close to the democratic candidate by running far right. I don't understand the thinking but I hope he alienates all the voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC