Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Towns Rethink Laws Against Illegal Immigrants - NY Times

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:15 AM
Original message
Towns Rethink Laws Against Illegal Immigrants - NY Times
Towns Rethink Laws Against Illegal Immigrants
By KEN BELSON and JILL P. CAPUZZO
Published: September 26, 2007 - NY Times

RIVERSIDE, N.J., Sept. 25 — A little more than a year ago, the Township Committee in this faded factory town became the first municipality in New Jersey to enact legislation penalizing anyone who employed or rented to an illegal immigrant.

Within months, hundreds, if not thousands, of recent immigrants from Brazil and other Latin American countries had fled. The noise, crowding and traffic that had accompanied their arrival over the past decade abated.

The law had worked. Perhaps, some said, too well.

With the departure of so many people, the local economy suffered. Hair salons, restaurants and corner shops that catered to the immigrants saw business plummet; several closed. Once-boarded-up storefronts downtown were boarded up again.

http://tinyurl.com/2m6y8q



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. As Nelson would say: HA HA
You poor anit-immigration saps, you just shot yourselves in the foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. So last week, the town rescinded the ordinance, joining a small but growing
Meanwhile, the town was hit with two lawsuits challenging the law. Legal bills began to pile up, straining the town’s already tight budget. Suddenly, many people — including some who originally favored the law — started having second thoughts.

So last week, the town rescinded the ordinance, joining a small but growing list of municipalities nationwide that have begun rethinking such laws as their legal and economic consequences have become clearer.

“I don’t think people knew there would be such an economic burden,” said Mayor George Conard, who voted for the original ordinance. “A lot of people did not look three years out.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, duh
Of course businesses that cater to illegals will suffer. Did they think all the commerce based on illegals would continue? But business everywhere in the US is suffering. It is not necessarily due to the lack of illegal employees. It just happens more quickly when you are use to catering to an illegal population and they suddenly disappear.

It's like complaining because you no longer have customers for forged documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheapdate Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. No, it's not like complaining becaus you no longer have customers for forged documents (IMHO)
Riverside, N.J. Mayor George Conard was talking about the lost revenue from legitimate businesses, like hair salons, restaurants, and grocery stores.

He wasn't talking about his town's loss of illegitimate businesses, like forged document shops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Businesses that cater to illegals?
What kinds of businesses are those, pray tell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-26-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Another aspect to this is law enforcement
We did a forum in our city several years ago and had the official spokesperson for the local police department. Someone brought up illegal immigration and asked why the city didn't enforce immigration laws. He answered that the laws are a federal matter and the locals aren't required to enforce federal law. He said, however, that the subject had been brought up by the federal government, requesting the support of local police in enforcing federal immigration law. The officer said that they did not want to get into dealing with immigration matters as it would suck up a huge amount of manpower and resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC