Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The right to 35 mobiles (phones)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:08 PM
Original message
The right to 35 mobiles (phones)
http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/02/the-right-to-35.html#more



The mobile phone is a success story without equal. A good 15 years after the birth of the mobile network, almost half of the world population (2.7 billion people) owns a mobile phone. That does not mean that during this time only 2.7 billion phones were produced – it’s a multiple of that amount. In 2007 alone, 1.16 billion phones were sold, a large amount of them replacement purchases. In principle, a mobile phone can be used ten years or longer. But there are dozens of reasons to replace the appliance much earlier...At first, mobiles were being replaced because they became smaller and because they weighed less – a feature that improves portability. Next, the cellular phone with built-in camera arrived on the market, accompanied by a colour screen. These cameras get more pixels each year, another reason to buy a new phone. In the meantime, the devices got more memory, the screen got bigger and the telephones were equipped with a folding keyboard that makes sending text messages easier. Following that came machines with a built-in mp3-player.....
That means that every one of us will acquire around 35 mobile phones during his or her lifetime. From an environmental perspective, the production of all those machines outweighs the energy use of the phone itself. According to a life cycle analysis carried out by order of Nokia, 70 percent of the total energy use of a mobile telephone takes place during the production phase: the mining of the resources, the production of the components, the assembling of the machine and finally the transport of resources, components and finished products. Charging the phone only takes up 30 percent of its total energy use.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"70 to 95 percent of the total energy use of a mobile telephone takes place during the production phase"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The amount of energy used is not small: during its lifetime a mobile phone equals an average energy consumption of 260 megajoules (MJ) – 180 MJ for the manufacturing and 80 MJ for the usage phase. 260 MJ is enough to power 1,200 60 watt light bulbs for one hour. Multiply that by 35 (the amount of phones during one’s lifetime) and then by 2.7 billion (the amount of people that can afford a mobile nowadays) and it becomes clear that progress has a price. In addition, more than 90 percent of waste is also generated during the production phase.

A landline phone consumes much less electricity than a mobile phone (in fact it gets powered by the switchboard via the copper cable) and it lasts much longer – at least, that was the case until the arrival of the mobile, because since then also fixed phones changed into mobile, fashionable appliances.

Telephone infrastructure


The mobile telephone infrastructure also consumes more energy than the fixed phone infrastructure. According to a Swiss study dating from December 2004, transmitting information over a mobile network costs 3 times more energy than over a fixed network (including the extra copper and fibre glass used by the fixed phone network). The switch from GSM to networks of the third generation (like UMTS) will propel energy use even further. These networks need 50 percent more base stations which consume four times more energy.


Even if the energy consumption of the total phone network is considered, the production phase of the phones remains decisive (around 50 percent of energy use). There are many more telephones than base stations and the network infrastructure lasts on average 8 times longer than the phones. The researchers conclude that extending the life span of the phones from one to four years would lower the ecological impact of the complete telephone infrastructure by 40 percent. According to the Swiss, charging a mobile only makes up 5 to 15 percent of its total energy consumption.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"If you want to make an ecological choice, there is only one option: keep your mobile as long as possible, and turn your back on all novelties"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The (little) efforts of the manufacturers to green their gadgets are mostly aimed at reducing the energy consumption during the use phase. If we want to contain the energy use of the phone network, it is however much more effective to lengthen the life span of the mobiles. Furthermore, the increased energy efficiency is always again cancelled out by extra applications that consume more energy. Even mobile phones that are being recharged by means of solar panels or a hand crank do not have much influence on the ecological damage of the technology. Neither do phones that are easier to recycle, because as mentioned earlier 90 percent of the waste is generated during the production. The (indeed huge) amount of e-waste is therefore only the tip of the iceberg.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. My first mobile phone lasted 5 me years
I replaced it only because it was too outdated to work with my network. The new one will be used until the same thing happens. It's capable of text messaging, voice mail, etc. I have all that crap turned off because I neither want nor use my phone for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. One is more than enough
If we had plenty of pay phones, we wouldn't need cell phones. But a cell phone infrastructure is rather easier to maintain; more difficult to vandalize too...

Yet it is deemed a "luxury" in our society. I can't fully agree with that mindset, but I don't fully disagree with it either...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. They started phasing out pay phones long ago.
It's been at least 10 years since they started disappearing. By the time my daughter was old enough for a driver's permit, it was utterly impossible to find a pay phone.

That's when I finally broke down and got us cell phones. In exchange, I eliminated the land line as an unnecessary redundancy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I kept mine... 2 reasons..
1. DSL is somewhat more secure than cable for internet access (an inevitable prerequisite if one uses a computer or if one's job depends on it - at least 256kb up/down)

2. Even with my cell phone; I've still used the land line on occasion.

But each person's situation is unique... :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That's interesting about DSL.
I work on line at home and use cable internet. Reliability has never been a problem, even in Mexico. A couple of friends have had DSL and complained about it, so I never tried it.

Since I listen for a living (medical transcription), I actually hate talking on the phone. I think there are maybe four people in the whole world I'm happy to speak with on the phone (three of whom don't have/use a computer). Everyone else has to settle for email. :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC