Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hale "Bonddad" Stewart :To Republicans: Conservatism Has Failed. Deal With It

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:36 AM
Original message
Hale "Bonddad" Stewart :To Republicans: Conservatism Has Failed. Deal With It
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/hale-stewart/to-republicans-conservat_b_85816.html


I have a guilty pleasure to admit: I have been listening to right wing radio over the last few weeks with increasing pleasure. I am reminded of the phrase, "when in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging." However, it's doubtful they will take my advice. But in listening to Rush and Hannity and reading the likes of Powerline and RedState, I see them dance around the central issue without quite getting there. So let me offer my help to help them get to that ever important point of acceptance...You guys controlled the While House and Congress for 6 years. The country saw what you want to accomplish and are experiencing the impact of your policies. And guess what? THEY THINK CONSERVATIVE GOVERNMENT STINKS.

Let's start with the big one.

*No one likes Iraq. Between the shifting rationale for the war, the ever-increasing cost, the continued loss of American lives and the Iraqi's inability to form any kind of meaningful government, Iraq was a bad idea all the way around. Period. Spin it how you like, you're going to come up with the same answer.

*Terry Schiavo: This was by far the clearest indication of what the religious right will do if they attain power. And it isn't pretty. Let's tackle this by showing how clearly this situation violated literally every core Republican belief.

*"Republicans believe in state's rights." This situation was litigated for years at the state level, in an area of law that traditionally has happened at the state level. The religious right didn't like the result, so they made it a federal issue.

*"Republicans believe in individual rights." Schiavo's husband demonstrated in court that his wife wanted to die should her then current situation happen to her. That was her individual choice. A judge agreed. The religious right decided that just wasn't good enough.

*"Limited Federal Government". The Republicans used the federal government to interject themselves into a family matter.

*Katrina: This is what happens when people who don't like government and don't think it can work are put in charge.

*The economy: The Republicans -- the party of fiscal conservatism -- have added an additional $3.2 trillion dollars to the federal debt. They have created an economy build on debt at the consumer level and hoped to leave office before the secret got out. Well, the secret got out and people have figured out it was a giant illusion.

Here's the point: every policy that the Republicans have initiated has fallen apart. It doesn't work plain and simple. The Republicans wonder why there's an enthusiasm gap? Even Republican voters realize they're failed. Only the hard-core 30% Republican supporters are hanging on right now. Fine -- let them. It's their choice.

Every "true conservative" Republican candidate has failed. The reason? Conservative polities don't work. You guys are trying to sell a typewriter in a word processor world.

When Republican are in charge

-- they are nothing more than power hungry spendthrifts who will add hundreds of billions to the national debt

-- they will lie to go to war (despite most of you never serving in the military yourself)

-- they will use the Federal government to interject themselves into personal family matters if their religious right leaders want them to.


Raise your hand if that's what you want in government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. But...the republicons have never, ever tried conservativism
Edited on Thu Feb-14-08 08:41 AM by SpiralHawk
They only use the word "conservative" as a propaganda ploy to mask their greed-head corporate anti-Constitution Totalitarian radicalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly. Conservatism didn't fail. It was never tried.
Conservatism would dictate that you leave the land in good heart. That you pass to your children an estate, nation, and world better than you found it or, at least, not one bit worse.

Conservatism would dictate that you waste nothing.

Conservatism minds its own damn business. It does not look in its neighbor's bedroom window, tap its neighbor's phone, or read its neighbor's mail.

War is profligate and wasteful of resources. A conservative would prefer to negotiate to avoid such waste.

Seen ANY of that lately?

Neither have I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. RW Conservatism may be down---but Conservatism on the
Left is alive and well. Keep eyes and ears peeled for results
of the Boren Group. Group of Conservative Democrats snf Mkoderate
Republicans developing wide ranging policies. To members
were on Charlie Rose last night--Sam Nunn and Bill Cohen.
Charlie Rose.com. This group is not developing all this
policy for the fun of it. CharlieRose.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-14-08 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've been saying this for years.
IT DOESN'T WORK. They really are NOT good for the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC