Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush gave an interview to Fox News on Sunday- a keeper

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:23 AM
Original message
Bush gave an interview to Fox News on Sunday- a keeper
Edited on Fri Feb-15-08 11:44 AM by underpants
*on Obama*
WALLACE: So why do you think he's gotten this far if people don't know what he stands for?

BUSH: You're the pundit. I'm just a simple president.


*Followed directly by*
WALLACE: And you've done this a little bit, let's project ahead to November, the Republican nominee whoever it ends up being is going to have to carry along and deal with a faltering economy.

BUSH: How do you know that?

WALLACE: Well it is as of this moment.

BUSH: You said November.

WALLACE: All right, you can see that we will -- it won't, but at this point, he would be weighed down by a faltering economy, an unpopular war, at least according to the polls and forgive me running (INAUDIBLE) unpopular president. How does he overcome all of that and...

BUSH: Because there's two big issues. One is, who's going to keep your taxes low? Most Americans feel overtaxed and I promise you the Democrat party is going to field a candidate who says I'm going to raise your tax.

If they're going to say, oh, we're only going to tax the rich people, but most people in America understand that the rich people hire good accountants and figure out how not to necessarily pay all the taxes and the middle class gets stuck.

We've had -- we've been through this drill before. We're only going to tax the rich and all you have to do is look at the history of that kind of language and see who gets stuck with the bill.

And the other one, this is a dangerous world and Americans understand it's dangerous. They understand we're under threat of attack and whoever our nominee is is going to have to convince them that we will take whatever measures are necessary to protect us.
*this is not the first time he has asserted (actually stated it before) that the terrorists want to raise taxes or at least are against tax cuts*

* this is leadership*
BUSH: You know, I met with General Petraeus when I was in Kuwait on my trip to the Middle East. And my message to the general was, success is paramount. And therefore, whatever you recommend, make it based upon the need to succeed.
*(same answer) THIS is nonsense*
They may be all the same, they may not be all the same. But I will listen, give them careful consideration and make up my mind. But it is going to based upon whether or not we can succeed or not.

*never touched a law book. Presidenting makes it nonnecassary*
BUSH: First of all, whatever we have done was legal, and whatever decision I will make will be reviewed by the Justice Department to determine whether or not the legality is there. And the reason why there is a difference between what happened in the past and today, there is a new law.

And so to answer your question, whatever we will do would be legal. The American people have got to know that what we did in the past gained information that prevented an attack. And for those who criticize what we did in the past, I ask them, which attack would they rather have not permitted — stopped?.

Which attack on America did they — would they have said, well, you know, maybe it wasn't all that important that we stop those attacks. And I will do what is necessary to protect American within the law. That is what you have got to understand.*I'll try*

WALLACE: Mr. President, we have to take one final time out, but when we come back, we'll take a look back at President Bush's seven years in office and what comes next, back in a moment.

* 9/11 never happened?*
On the other hand, when you really think about it, we haven't had an attack on America. We have inherited a recession and had 52 months of uninterrupted job growth which is a record.

Wages up, productivity up. Look, I feel good about my record. But look, it's impossible for short term historians to objectively analyze it. I know that.
*what do they do after their short terms as historians ends? :shrug: *

*later*
And there is no such thing as short-term history. There just isn't — objective history. I don't know how many books that have written about my administration, probably more than any other president, which actually says I'm doing something.




forgot the link


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,330234,00.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R, for the simple president.
Nice collection there. :rofl: and :cry:

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It reminded me of Phil Hartman's (SNL) Unfrozen Cavemen Lawyer


I'm just a simple cavemen I can't possibly understand your complex and intricate legal system, but....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. OMG!
:spray:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. The first few lines sound like third graders talking
WALLACE: So why do you think he's gotten this far if people don't know what he stands for?

BUSH: You're the pundit. I'm just a simple president.


*Followed directly by*
WALLACE: And you've done this a little bit, let's project ahead to November, the Republican nominee whoever it ends up being is going to have to carry along and deal with a faltering economy.

BUSH: How do you know that?

WALLACE: Well it is as of this moment.

BUSH: You said November.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"I'm just a simple president"
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sometimes, I really do think that, along with having strong psychopathic tendencies, Bush truly...
...is at least mildly mentally handicapped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. hey Bush - tons of books have been written about simply awful leaders and horrible people
I would not try to use that as a benchmark for the quality of your administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I'm just a simple(ton) president"
This nightmare can not end soon enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. Heard Wallace gushing on a RW station this AM, talking about what an honor it was
to interview a President ... too bad he didn't feel that way about Bill Clinton not that long ago ...

In this interview, did Mike Wallace even really challenge the simpleton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rec. Also, here's some entertaining analysis of what Bush said about Obama...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. And yet 33% still support him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush:
"...And for those who criticize what we did in the past, I ask them, which attack would they rather have not permitted...uh...stopped?"*

Well, George that's a tough question but I guess 9/11 is the attack that I would have not permitted.

*As usual the transcipt misses out his fumble to find the right word after realising that he's given the game away in a Freudian slip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Bush is an honest-to-god psychopath....Dr. Robert Hare
is currently the pre-eminent researcher on psychopathy (not to be confused with psychopathology, a term most often used for mental disorders in general). Dr. Hare has built on the work of Hervey Cleckley in the 40's and 50's.

Dr. Hare distinguishes between psychopathy and sociopathy.

This is not meant to be a sub-thread. Relevance of this post to the OP:

Read Dr. Hare's book, "Without Conscience." This book was published in 1993, so it's NOT a screed about pResident Bush. Read about speech patterns of psychopaths. Prepare for an eye-opening experience.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NastyRiffraff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-17-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
13. Oh, God...January 20, 2009 can't come soon enough!
I just want this cretin out of our White House. Hillary, Barack...either will be light years better than this moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC