-snip-
For those ginning up a run for Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell as a Democratic vice presidential candidate, his comments this week are likely to dash cold water on the hot topic.
Rendell likely didn’t win points with either Sens. Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama when he first said that Obama’s race would cause him some problems in the state and then followed it up with another notion that Clinton’s gender could also get in the way.
-snip-
We can’t pretend that gender and race aren’t significant in the 2008 campaign. We’d like to. We’d like to simply run the Associated Press campaign stories without always seeing the lines “first black president” or “first woman president” when the topic comes ’round to Obama or Clinton. But that line almost always appears. It’s out there. The media aren’t ignoring it, and it would be hypocritical for those who aren’t ignoring it to excoriate others who choose to do the same.
-snip-
We’re not taking sides yet in that coming battle. But we will say that it should not, for any voter, come down to a decision between voting for a white man or a white woman or black man. It’s an immaterial question. Pick any of hundreds of other issues-based options on which to cast a vote. We’re 230something years old; time to show some maturity.
http://www.ldnews.com/editorials/ci_8271899