Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congress's Betrayal of the American Worker

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:21 PM
Original message
Congress's Betrayal of the American Worker
by Richard Backus

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19364.htm

While claiming to be attempting to increase the number of well-paying jobs in the U.S. (having created laws in the past explicitly designed to do this), the Congress has really been following a completely different course. Almost all recently passed laws have done just the opposite.

(snip)

There was no effort to carry out the intent of these Acts. They were passed to create an appearance that these goals were being pursued while congress passed laws which did just the opposite. "Gloabalization" was intended to allow American businessmen to replace American workers with low-priced foreign ones. Since American corporations own much of the foreign manufacturing businesses, a foreign worker is simply an employee of an American firm hired overseas to replace an American worker stateside. The congress threw in an added tax sweetener to further facilitate this giveaway.

NAFTA and CAFTA had the same intent. So much for "promoting" full employment for U.S. citizens. Immigration policy, legal and illegal as well, was designed to do the same. No real serious efforts were made to stop the border crossings. The proof of this is in the number of illegal immigrants who succeeded. Legal immigration in the high-tech sector was a fraud from the get-go. Businessmen simply wanted younger, less expensive, and more pliable employees. Those older native ones wanted to be fairly treated and paid appropriately for a highly-trained engineer. Again, it was the government that "legally" made this jobs giveaway possible. The age-discrimination laws were ignored and tons of young (inexperienced) but low-salaried foreigners came surging in.

The immigration laws themselves were violated from the very beginning, proof being that high-tech salary levels immediately took a big dip violating the law's requirement that immigrants were to be paid equal wages. When it was obvious that wages were falling, the congress did nothing.

(snip)

The public's inability or unwillingness to face up these betrayals will result in the destruction of the working class in the U.S. If the public does not protest, they will continue to get a government that no one deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama and Clinton supported CAFTA. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yup. THAT should be shouted from the rooftops.
BOTH are NOT candidates of CHANGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You're wrong - Both voted NAY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I read some speeches they made. Interesting! I stand corrected. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. NP - I'm an Edwards suporter myself.
I'll vote for which ever of the Corporate Twins makes it.
Anything, even one of teh corporate Twins is better than any republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. The problem is slave wages in China, India and Indonesia. If Mexico were getting...
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 05:23 PM by MookieWilson
THAT many of our jobs, then they wouldn't all be heading up here in increasing numbers as they are.

It's very tough on people in trades who have seen their wages become stagnant because of the larger legal and illegal labor pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trthnd4jstc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why such a push for globalization?
There is a conspiracy theory that the CFR (Council of Foreign Relations) is actually working for zero employment, I take this to mean that all of us in the Working Class are meant to die, and that they wish to have a world ruled by the Bankers. If this is the case, the CFR is guilty of Sedition! Globalization has weakened our economy, and the only ones it benefits, are the rich. Globalization, does not help out the majority of the Working Class in this country, and this is what should matter to our Representatives. I wish for noone to suffer, and struggle, but our representatives should be serving us first, and not the interests of the Large Corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. They need to WIN the race to the Bottom
in order to destroy America. It is their goal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC