Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 325

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
top10 ADMIN Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:02 AM
Original message
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 325


The Top 10 Conservative Idiots, No. 325

February 18, 2008
Con McCain Edition

This week John McCain (1) says one thing and does another, Mitt Romney (2) pretends to be cheerful, House Republicans (6) get in a snit, and Rush Limbaugh (8) attempts to pull off an ingenious double bluff. Enjoy, and don't forget the key!



John McCain

If you can say one good thing about John McCain, it's that he is strongly opposed to torture. And for good reason - after all, the man was tortured while a POW in Vietnam. That's why McCain has stood up time and again to oppose the Bush administration's torture policy, and why he sponsored the 2006 Detainee Treatment Act.

McCain had another opportunity to go toe-to-toe with George W. Bush last week when the Senate voted on a bill which would force the CIA to conduct interrogations using the same rules laid out in the Army Field Manual. Since the Army Field Manual bans techniques like waterboarding, this would effectively prevent the CIA from using torture during interrogations. Bush had already threatened to veto the bill, saying "They are imposing a set of standards on our intelligence communities in terms of interrogating prisoners that our people will think will be ineffective." (Translation: I'm the Decider, and I've decided to torture people.)

So step forward John McCain! Demonstrate that famous honor and integrity by voting for this bill and telling the world, "America says no to torture!"

It's a mighty fine line to walk. Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) opposes torture. But when the Senate held a vote yesterday that would effectively prevent the CIA from employing torture by restricting interrogation techniques to those under the Army Field Manual, he voted against it.

You can read his extended explanation of that vote below. But here's what it comes down to. The bill yesterday would have restricted the CIA to the Army's rules for interrogating detainees. McCain believes that the CIA should have a freer hand. That includes the use of "enhanced interrogation" techniques.

Huh? What? This doesn't sound like the honorable John McCain the media keeps telling me about.

The leading Republican presidential candidate, Senator John McCain of Arizona, a former prisoner of war who steadfastly opposes the use of torture, voted against the bill. Mr. McCain said the ban would limit the C.I.A.'s ability to gather intelligence. "We always supported allowing the C.I.A. to use extra measures," he said.

At the same time, he said that he believed "waterboarding is illegal and should be banned" and that the agency must adhere to existing federal law and international treaties.

Oh. Well, I guess just because McCain likes to ride around in a bus called the Straight Talk Express, it doesn't mean he has to stand by his principles during an election year. After all, if he votes against torture, what will Sean Hannity say?

This shouldn't be too hard for McCain to spin though. He can just say he voted for banning torture before he voted against it. That's the ticket.



Mitt Romney

It wasn't all bad news for John McCain last week though - he was endorsed by the recently thwarted Heir To Ronald Reagan's Hair, Mitt Romney. "Even when the contest was close and our disagreements were debated, the caliber of the man was apparent," Romney said.

Really? See, I'm not so sure about that. For the past few months I've seen some pretty ugly rumors about John McCain being spread around. For example - did you know that he has an "incoherent tax policy," and that his immigration legislation is "a disaster in the making?"

:youtube1:

And did you know that the man on the street thinks McCain has been in Washington far too long, doesn't listen to the American people, and wants to give our jobs to illegal immigrants?

:youtube2:

It's true. John McCain is a confused old man who doesn't know whether he's coming or going.

:youtube3:

But that's okay - Mitt now encourages upstanding Republicans to vote for him anyway. Because as you can see, the caliber of the man is apparent.



The Soon To Be Never Heard From Again Wing Of The Republican Party

Of course, those attack ads by Mitt Romney look like the ultimate in class once you see what the knuckledragging GOP base has got lined up for the rest of 2008. Take a look at some of the merchandise that was on sale at CPAC last week - you know, the conservative conference attended by all the major Republican presidential contenders, not to mention the president and vice-president of the United States of America - and you'll get a feel for the wingnuts' election strategy this year.

For example, here's how they feel about their very own presidential nominee...


Yee-ikes. Although deep down, you know conservatives want to make love, not war.


Er... okay.

But don't assume that the Democrats are going to get off easy this year! Hell no!


That's right, Democrats are communists and Barack Obama's middle name is Hussein. Oh, stop it, that hurts!

And of course, they saved their wittiest work for Hillary Clinton:


Clever stuff.



The RNC

Even the RNC wants to get in on this "humor" thing that liberals find so amusing, although they don't seem to have quite figured it out yet. For example, this year they decided to make some Valentine cards that rank-and-file Republicans could send to their friends. Check it out...


That's right - the RNC would like you to know that Barack Obama is not a Washington insider.

And as for Hillary Clinton - she's... er...


Okay, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.



The American Family Association

While we're on the subject of the Soon To Be Never Heard From Again Wing Of The Republican Party, let's check in and see how our friends at the American Family Association are getting on. Now that War On Christmas season is over, the AFA are turning their attention to other pressing matters.

"Send an email to TV Land president Larry Jones," harumphed AFA honcho Donald Wildmon in an email last week, "letting him know you are offended that TV Land so easily disrespects Christians by belittling their faith."

Uh oh... what has TV Land done now? Have they got "The Last Temptation of Christ" on the schedule? Are they trying to sneak a Philip Pullman biography in between "Three's Company" and "The Beverly Hillbillies?"

Oh, I'm afraid it's much worse than that.

The TV Land network has a new feature starting this Saturday (Feb. 16) called "OHMIGOD, That's so 80's weekend." The series features movies from the 1980's.

And that's not all, because you see...

"OHMIGOD" is an irreverent exclamation for "Oh, my God!"

It is? Oh my God!

The promotional ad is playing on the television broadcast and on their website at www.tvland.com. (WARNING: If you visit their website, the ad plays automatically.)

I can't tell you in words how offensive it is to listen to the advertisement for this new show as they must say "OHMIGOD" five times in 30 seconds.

Disrespect for Christians and God have gone on for some time with this phrase, but now we have a network that feels it appropriate to name an entire program series with this phrase.

Now, I went over to the TV Land website to see if this disturbing rumor is true, and the annoying audio stream that plays when you visit the site confirms that it is indeed "OHMIGOD, That's so 80's weekend!" But Donald Wildmon's insecure temper tantrum does appear to have paid off, because the text on TV Land's website is now advertising "OHMYGOSH, That's so 80's weekend."

So they may not have managed to get a Constitutional amendment banning gay marriage, and they've failed to overturn Roe vs. Wade - but congratulations, AFA, for successfully forcing TVLand.com to slightly change their home page.



House Republicans

Waaaaah! Residents of the Washington DC metro area were treated to the sound of crying babies wafting gently across the Potomac last week as House Republicans closed their eyes, opened their mouths, and screamed for mama. At issue was the rule of law, something which Republicans used to really feel quite strongly about. But oh, those days are long gone.

The House voted Thursday to hold two of President George W. Bush's confidants in contempt for failing to cooperate with an inquiry into whether a purge of federal prosecutors was politically motivated.

Angry Republicans boycotted the vote and walked out.

To recap: in the summer of 2007, former White House chief of staff Josh Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers were subpoenaed by the House Judiciary Committee. Since there's one rule for the Bush administration and another rule for everyone else in this country, Bolten and Miers simply ignored the subpoenas and failed to show up for hearings. (See Idiots 301.)

Now, you'd think that blowing off Congress would be something Republicans would usually be concerned about - and if we were talking about Democrats blowing off Congress, you'd be right. But rather than stand up for the rule of law and support the contempt charges, GOP legislators threw a hissyfit and walked out.

Republicans said Democrats should instead be working on extending a law -- set to expire Saturday -- allowing the government to eavesdrop on phone calls and e-mails in the United States in cases of suspected terrorist activity.

That's right - rather than worrying about an Executive Branch that is literally cockslapping America in the face, Republicans want to spend more time figuring out ways to listen to your telephone conversations and read your emails. And they feel so strongly about this that they will stand up as one and walk out of Congress.

Fortunately the House was still able to do the people's business and voted to hold Bolten and Miers in contempt by a margin of 223-32. So here's an idea, House Republicans - next time you decide to walk out, don't bother coming back.



George W. Bush

Last week, director Steven Spielberg announced that he was quitting as artistic director of this year's Beijing Olympics, because, according to Think Progress, "China is not doing enough to pressure Sudan to end the genocide in Darfur."

Soon afterwards, George W. Bush was asked during an interview with the BBC whether he would "applaud" Spielberg's decision.

"That's up to him," Bush said dismissively, adding, "I'm going to the Olympics. I view the Olympics as a sporting event."

A sporting event, eh? That's quite the historical worldview you've got there, George.







But never mind all that - to Our Great Leader, the Olympic Games are just a sporting event.

So George, are you done making America look like a nation of petty, ignorant, uncaring douchebags run by a 160-pound sack of potatoes, or do you want to add anything else?

"I mean, you got the Dalai Lama crowd. You've got global warming folks. You've got, you know, Darfur," he said. "I am not gonna you know, go and use the Olympics as an opportunity to express my opinions to the Chinese people in a public way."

Well I guess I shouldn't have asked.



Rush Limbaugh

Sure, John McCain may think that his most impressive endorsement so far is from convicted felon Oliver North, but he's wrong. The honor goes to Rush Limbaugh, who revealed last week that he is in fact McCain's "most valuable asset."

How so? Well, according to CNN:

Commenting on the mainstream media's fixation with his feelings about McCain, Limbaugh said there may be more to his criticisms than meets the eye.

"If I really wanted to torpedo McCain, I would endorse him," Limbaugh said on his radio show. "Because that would send the independents and liberals who are going to vote for him running away faster than anything."

"What people don't realize is that I am doing McCain the biggest favor that can be done for him by staying out of this," he continued. "If I endorsed him thoroughly and with passion, that would end the independents and moderates, because they so despise me and they so hate me."

(snip)

"Couldn't it be said, if somebody wanted to...that I am secretly supporting McCain, because I secretly do want him to win, but I know full well that if I come out and endorse him, he's cooked?" Limbaugh asked. "Who may be in this whole kit and caboodle, this whole shebang, the most valuable asset McCain has? Me."

Or in other words...


"Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!"

See, when Limbaugh said last month that if McCain gets the nomination, "it's going to destroy the Republican Party," and when he said "I can see possibly not supporting a Republican nominee," he was bluffing. When he mocked John McCain's military service in 2004 and 2005, he did so with a nod and a wink. And when he helped George W. Bush defeat McCain for the GOP nomination in 2000, he was just looking ahead.

Yes, despite what he's been saying for the past eight years, Rush Limbaugh actually secretly really likes John McCain and has been plotting since 2000 to put him in power. His constant attacks have merely been part of a clever ploy to make McCain more popular with independent voters.

Now I know what you're thinking - if that's the case, why does he spend all day attacking liberals and Democrats? Does he want to help us with independents too? Well don't worry about that. Limbaugh's plan is far too cunning for our lesser minds to comprehend.



Mike Huckabee

He may be down, but he's not out! That is to say, he may be out, but he's not leaving! Mike Huckabee is still in the race for the GOP nomination, even though he can't win. But heck, running for president is fun and profitable, so why stop?

For example, last week Mike took a break from the campaign trail and headed to the Cayman Islands. According to USA Today:

Mike Huckabee will be in that warmer clime until Sunday. He's due to speak at the Young Caymanian Leadership Awards banquet -- a paid gig -- on Saturday.

Fox News' Embed Producers blog reports that Huckabee campaign chief Chip Saltsman had this to say about his candidate's weekend plans:

"We're not giving up. He hasn't had two days off in a row in over a year. ... We are coming right back on the trail on Sunday night."

And Wonkette noted last week that Huckabee is not above cashing in while he's still got the mojo - just last week he sent an email to Evian groveling for free water.


But the funniest part of all this? According to the Houston Chronicle:

A poll released Friday found Sen. John McCain and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee in a statistical tie in Texas, with McCain garnering 45 percent of the vote and Huckabee taking 41 percent.

That's right - the guy who's on vacation in the Cayman Islands is currently running even with the GOP presidential nominee in Texas. Wow.



Rudy Giuliani

And finally, if you've ever wondered what kind of leadership skills it takes to blow $50 million on the most pathetic presidential campaign in American history, I have some good news. Last week Politico.com obtained an email announcing Rudy Giuliani's return to the lecture circuit.

WSB is honored to announce that Rudy Giuliani, one of the most respected leaders in the world, has returned to Washington Speakers Bureau for exclusive representation. A visionary leader, Giuliani has always epitomized "grace under pressure," and nowhere was that more apparent than in his recent bid for the presidency.

Giuliani galvanized the electorate by focusing much-needed attention on such issues as security, domestic and international terrorism and securing a future that's prosperous and beneficial for all Americans.

Giuliani candidly discusses insights from his public and private sector experiences, including transformative lessons in leadership.

I must say it's very nice of them to take care of Rudy like this. Last I heard he was still down in Florida...


See you next week!

-- EarlG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Third Rec, first post!
Getting faster!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobTheSubgenius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. K&R
Stellar, as always.

Oddly, it was Top Ten that brought me here in the first place; someone posted a link to it at another.....uhhh....venue of reasoned discussion, and I guess you could say I took to it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. "Life's better under a Conservative" ?
Who designed that poster? Larry Craig?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ted Haggert
Larry Craig's said "Life's better on your knees"

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I thought it was "Life's better in a stall."
Edited on Mon Feb-18-08 06:16 AM by lame54
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Republicans... the Grand Old Pediphiles with wide stances...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. The only problem with the "Life's Better Under a Conservative" poster
is that, for realism, instead of showing a guy's buffed torso, it should present the perspective as the sole of one of his wingtipped shoes is about to crush your face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Anybody want a peanut ?
As they sail off, we hear their voices as the boat recedes.

INIGO
FEZZIK, are there rocks ahead?

FEZZIK
If there are, we'll all be dead.

VIZZINI
No more rhymes now, I mean it.

FEZZIK
Anybody want a peanut?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. I soooo want one of those McCain t-shirts! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. HONOR AMONG CROOKS--the princess bride says it best--->
colin powell betrayed all of us--> (Westley: We are men of action, lies do not become us)

mccain sadly following suit about torture--> (Count Rugen: Beautiful isn't it? It took me half a lifetime to invent it. I'm sure you've discovered my deep and abiding interest in pain. Presently I'm writing the definitive work on the subject, so I want you to be totally honest with me on how the machine makes you feel. This being our first try, I'll use the lowest setting.)

------- it can be said without much question... we know where to find the GOP

Buttercup: Westley, what about the R.O.U.S.'s?
Westley: Rodents Of Unusual Size? I don't think they exist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. they better start warming up those 'no less than gulfstream 4's' for the ghoul so..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
9. "an Executive Branch that is literally cockslapping America in the face,"
Thanks for that mental picture!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kibitzer 2006 Donating Member (78 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. So who voted how on contempt?
"And they feel so strongly about this that they will stand up as one and walk out of Congress."

The vote was 223-32. That got me thinking. Last I recall, there were 435 House seats, and about 233 were Democratic. Now I know there have been some resignations and deaths, but the numbers just didn't add up, so I went looking. You can get the final count from the Clerk of the House.

It turns out that 31 Republicans actually stayed around to vote "No". That still leaves a "No" vote unaccounted for. It was Cuellar (D?-TX). What's with that? Well, it turns out he's actually http://www.mydd.com/story/2006/2/15/11051/1831">Tom Tancredo in disguise.

Then there were the three Republicans who voted "Yes". They're a bunch of strange bedfellows:

Gilchrest (R-MD). OK, he's half of the Republicans left in Maryland. He's also on his way out (lost in the primary). If he ever wants to try again he might want to look like a Democrat.

Jones (R-NC). Sounds like a classic conservative: anti-abortion, anti-government-spending (except probably for his own district), English-only, etc.. But hey, he might actually be for the rule of law :).

Paul (R-Pluto). You know, he keeps coming up with sane positions (probably by accident, and mixed in with absolute idiocy).

And finally, voting "Present", is Porter (R-nowhere). I'd never heard of him, and still haven't heard from him.

So there it is. You can chase down for yourselves why the other 10 Democrats didn't vote.

--Kibitzer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
13. "an Executive Branch that is literally cockslapping America in the face"
Literally, huh? That's another big story the MSM have failed to report!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
momster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
14. AFA Must Hate HGTV
Whenever they 'reveal' a new room in somebody's house, the homeowner walks around for 5 minutes saying 'Oh, my God, Oh, my God!" Maybe a good solid letter campaign will get people to say "Oh, my Gosh, oh, my Gosh." Then....on to the right thing to say during sex!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Well, now that the annual War On Christmas has come and gone...
They need something to do! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeeDeeNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. OHMIGOD that was funny
Oops-- I mean OhMyGosh!!!


:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
16. For some reason this batch seems even worse than the usual idiots.
Item after item had me reading with dropped jaw. I mean, this stuff is literally unbelievable. How much worse can right-wingers possibly get before they simply keel over from the sheer weight of their hypocrisy and lies? Or will they get Raptured first?

Either way is fine; just so they are gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
17. Thug t-shirts
It frustrates me, yet amuses me, how the Thugs can be completely, totally, and willfully blind to what's happening around them right now, and yet they will seriously try to attack current Dem candidates by invoking....




....CHAPPAQUIDDICK!!!!!!!!!!


Omigawd! How can you support Obama when forty years ago Teddy Kennedy had a car accident?????

(And, yeah, I realize there's more to it than that, and that Ted should have handled it WAY DIFFERENTLY. And the Kennedy family has had their fingers in more than their share of shady activities, but still....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. And yet, Laura Bush "ran" a stop sign and killed an ex-boyfriend
and she, also, was never charged.

Funny how that goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurpleChez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I know it's almost become trite
for folks like us to whine about the double standard, but it is amazing. And if you presented said double standards to the typical RW'er they would likely not even acknowledge them. Or would have elaborate reasons why they were valid.

And BTW, I was just thinking about how I have to get a sticker like your avatar for my door. I know some of the door-to-door church folks mean well, but I've had too many wake me up on a saturday morning, and the rare few who adopt a "How can you be so STUPID not to accept the lord Jesus?" Uh...not the best way to win converts, there, pardner....

Word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Ask and ye shall receive!!!
http://www.evolvefish.com/fish/emblems.html
http://www.evolvefish.com/fish/stickers-ss7.html


One's an emblem and one's a sticker. Just scroll down to find'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deny and Shred Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I never heard that about Laura. Quality Top 10, as always
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Yeah, back in 1961, I believe. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hillary slogan
"If I could rearrange the alphabet I would put T and AX together"

I don't have to point out that A and X are not already next to each other as is implied. It should read "put T, A and X together"

Now THAT would be Hillary-arious!





...not. But it would at least be legible.

If there's one thing that Progs can claim dominance about its that we are way funnier. From Lenny Bruce to George Carlin to Maher,Colbert and Stewart. Who have they got? Andrew Dice Clay, Rich Little and Dennis Miller?

I swear someone should do a study on the phenomena. Conservative minds are void of any actual sense of humor. What happens to their brains?
Its the one unmatched weapon Progs have to wield against the humorless banality of evil that the right dishes out every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I agree with everything except your last paragraph.
Stephen Leacock was a brilliant, humane, and very funny humorist (there's a Canadian humour award named for him) who also happened to be a highly regarded political economy prof -- and a conservative, though his kind of conservatism would be unrecognizable to today's neo-"conservatives". I discovered his books when I was in high-school and he quickly became my favourite writer.

As for rearranging the alphabet, the Bush familiy kept STU where they were, but then they ripped P, I, and D from their normal places and stuck them after U.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Excellent!!!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-18-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. Mitt Romney
He brings flip floppin' to new heights!

Bravo Earl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MCMetal Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
29. I Hold .........
The entire garbage GOP in contempt ..........They are as useful as used toilet paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vinylsolution Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
30. Top 10 Conservatards
Whaaaat?? A top 10 without Billo in it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guyanakoolaid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
31. Excellent as usual
However, surely Huckabee has done or said something in the last week more ludicrous than giving Evian an address for the free water they offered him. Love ya, Ed, and love the Top 10, and can't stand Huckabee or any hard-core creationist for that matter, but to erroneously label that "groveling" could, in the mind of a more centrist reader, take away a small amount of credibility from other valid anti-Huckabee or anti-conservative arguments. Maybe the Top 10 isn't meant to win converts anyways, but it's usually always written with such wit and factuality that a few conversions are possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC