Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has Bush Been Spying, Blackmailing Congressional Democrats? By Paul Craig Roberts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:43 PM
Original message
Has Bush Been Spying, Blackmailing Congressional Democrats? By Paul Craig Roberts

President George W. Bush and his director of National Intelligence, Mike McConnell, are telling the American people that an unaccountable executive branch is necessary for their protection. Without the Protect America Act, Bush and McConnell claim, the executive branch will not be able to spy on terrorists, and we will all be blown up. Terrorists can only be stopped, Bush says, if Bush has the right to spy on everyone without any oversight by courts.

The fight over the Protect America Act has everything to do with our safety, only not in the way that Bush and McConnell assert.

Bush says the Democrats have put our country “more in danger of an attack” by letting the Protect America Act lapse. This claim is nonsense. The 30 year old Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act gives the executive branch all the power it needs to spy on terrorists.

The choice between FISA and the Protect America Act has nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism, at least not from foreign terrorists. Bush and his brownshirts object to FISA, because the law requires Bush to obtain warrants from a FISA court. Warrants mean that Bush is accountable. Bush and his brownshirts argue that accountability is an infringement on the power of the president.

To escape accountability, the Brownshirt Party came up with the Protect America Act. This act eliminates Bush’s accountability to judges and gives the telecom companies immunity from the felonies they committed by acquiescing in Bush’s illegal spying.

Bush began violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in October 2001 when he spied on Americans without obtaining warrants from the FISA court.

Bush pressured telecom companies to break the law in order to enable his illegal spying. In court documents, Joseph P. Nacchio, former CEO of Qwest Communications International, states that his firm was approached more than six months before the September 11, 2001, attacks and asked to participate in a spying operation that Qwest believed to be illegal. When Qwest refused, the Bush administration withdrew opportunities for contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Nacchio himself was subsequently indicted for insider trading, sending the message to all telecom companies to cooperate with the Bush regime or else.

Bush has not been held accountable for the felonies he committed and for leading telecom companies into a life of crime.

As the lawmakers who gave us FISA understood, spying on people without warrants lets a political party collect dirt on its adversaries with which to blackmail them.

As Bush illegally spied a long time before word of it got out, blackmail might be the reason the Democrats have ignored their congressional election mandate and have not put a stop to Bush’s illegal wars and unconstitutional police state measures.

http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/02/22/has-bush-been-spying-blackmailing-congressional-democrats-by-paul-craig-roberts/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. You mean february of 2001, not october of 2001.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. it says that here...
Bush pressured telecom companies to break the law in order to enable his illegal spying. In court documents, Joseph P. Nacchio, former CEO of Qwest Communications International, states that his firm was approached more than six months before the September 11, 2001, attacks and asked to participate in a spying operation that Qwest believed to be illegal. When Qwest refused, the Bush administration withdrew opportunities for contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Nacchio himself was subsequently indicted for insider trading, sending the message to all telecom companies to cooperate with the Bush regime or else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's a point most overlook. Bush started his illegal spying shortly after being installed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Why don't they scream it far and wide? It would simply blow away the post 9-11
argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carincross Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Joe Nacchio testimony in court papers
Remember that Joe Nacchio, former CEO of Qwest, has been convicted of insider trading. He is out on bail while his defense team prepares a motion for a new trial. One of Nacchio's defenses is that the NSA retaliated against Qwest after he turned down their request that Qwest do warrantless wiretapping on 02/27/01.

And Mark Klein, former AT&T technician, says that everything on the Internet - including Qwest customers data - was provided to the NSA for filtering at sites around the country.

http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/10/qwest-ceo-not-a.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. sounds right to me
any other plausible explanation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. Has Bush Been Spying, Blackmailing Congressional Democrats? Yes
Why would anyone think that Nixon-lite hasn't been blackmailing everyone, probably even his parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course blackmail is the reason. Bushists are arch-criminals, far worse than we yet know. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wundermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. How else would you explain the spineless behavior...
unless the democrats are controlled by the same corporate bribery, corruption, and blackmail?

Our government has become a house of thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. So tell me if they're being blackmailed why the fuck don't they step down
and allow someone who hasn't been caught at something blackmailable take their place? Why don't they think about the American people and not their own precious hides. If they've been caught at something that could cause them and the party a problem, they need to go and we need to find someone with a clean record OR the guts and determination to stand up to this shit even when threatened. Bring it all out in the open.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalArkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Ohh think about it, When Nixon-lites term is over, now who gets the headphones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'm not even gonna try to decipher that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. the best defense against blackmail is to release the truth
Take the lumps, go before cameras and tell about the blackmail.

Of course, the blackmail might be in a different form. It might be something like "we know the schedule your granddaughter follows each day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. COuld be. This is the same crowd that tried to kill democrats with anthrax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC