Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Bush/bin Laden Siamese Twins.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
wcepler Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:16 PM
Original message
The Bush/bin Laden Siamese Twins.
It's long been noted that Osama bin Laden is joined at the hip with George W. Bush. The most recent antic of the man Bush can NEVER catch (?) was Osama's photo op for Bush during the 2006 Presidential election, which made a HUGE difference! Wait and see. A few weeks before the Presidential election and Osama will "pop up" again. Las Vegas probably already has high odds it will happen.

Also, the Royal bin Laden family is joined at the hip with the Royal Bush Family. Pictures of the bin Laden's at the Bush ranch show the sheety sheiks virtually in the laps of the Bush's.

Isn't it odd how we seldom talk about Osama bin Laden? Why? Easy, it's because we KNOW Bush and bin Laden are virtual blood brothers, so why waste time playing the game that Bush is "chasing" Osama? Even dogs and cats know this is a lie.

Osama bin Laden falls into that same denial chasm we plop the "inside job" 9/11. Most of the country believes (in poll after poll) that 9/11 wasn't just ineptly "allowed" -- it was actively ENGINEERED. And we also suspect (know?) that the engineering wasn't restricted to the neocon cabal Americans.

The thing about 9/11 is to ask WHO BENEFITED FROM IT? This makes it so simple.

What political party "benefited" from 9/11? Duh, the pugs, the pugs, and only the pugs.

Next question: What COUNTRY "benefited" from 9/11 and I mean DRAMATICALLY benefited from 9/11? Since we all know the answer, we’ll leave it as a rhetorical question.

These last eight years have had an Alice in Wonderland aspect. A virtual infinity of Republican/Bush/necon lies, and horror shows like 9/11 which just sit there in a kind of science fiction denial land.

And bin Laden, the allegedly ultimate bad guy who Bush could have easily captured in the field, but we did everything but drive the guy to safety in a Porsche. It should have been shooting fish in a barrel, but Bush couldn't even hit the barrel (much less the fish).

And here's all this Iraq and Afghanistan business which has the SOLE PURPOSE of making billionaires, mega billionaires (hint: Cheney/Halliburton). And what are we doing about this exchange of our children's blood for stolen Middle Eastern Oil? 3 guesses: nothing, nothing, and nothing.

The shaming tragedy is that most of us already KNOW these things, e.g., the 9/11 inside job, the Iraq/Afghanistan money cow oil wars, and the Bush/bin Laden Siamese twin. But the castle of denial reaches to the sun and so we just "give up". It's like being brainwashed that the Pacific Ocean is really made of styrofoam. We know its nuts, but we just "go along" with the psychosis.

Same thing with 9/11, Osama bin Laden, and Iraq/Afghanistan money cow Oil Wars (for which our children are cannon fodder).

But truth has a way of "trickling" through the cracks, especially with the colossal help of the internet, and when 9/11, bin Laden, and the Bush/Cheney oil wars (tip of the iceberg), finally rise with the strong truth wings of the American Eagle, then politics will be transcended with the rule of law and a Constitutional Republic -- and propaganda will be replaced with prisons. Where else would you put these infinite traitors?

And you know what? These anti-American scum KNOW this -- and you better believe they are running scared.
*****************************************************************

W. Christopher Epler (Bill)

<http://theliberationofrealism.blogspot.com/>













Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bin Laden tape was two days before the '04 election.
The court's guilty verdict and death sentence for Saddam was two days before the 06 elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester_11218 Donating Member (914 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. BUSH & BIN LADEN Kindred Spirits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinita Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-26-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. The October surprise is always a possibility
Never underestimate the malice of the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Remember the Maine! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. Zelikow quote:
From Foreign Affairs, November/December 1998

Excerpt:

"If the device that exploded in 1993 under the World Trade Center had been nuclear, or had effectively dispersed a deadly pathogen, the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America's fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, this event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures, scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects, and use of deadly force."

http://www.foreignaffairs.org/19981101faessay1434/ashton-b-carter-john-deutch-philip-zelikow/catastrophic-terrorism-tackling-the-new-danger.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC