Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush releases records -- it backfires

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:44 PM
Original message
Bush releases records -- it backfires
GEORGE W. BUSH RELEASES MILITARY SERVICE RECORDS. IT BACKFIRES.

President George W. Bush has had the White House release his disputed military pay records, and the results are not what George Bush obviously hoped for and what his PR man is spinning so superficially. Looking closer, the military service pay and retirement records prove that George Bush is GUILTY AS CHARGED by Sen. John Kerry and others.

The records show George W. Bush was paid for only 9 days' service between May 1972 and May 26, 1974, when his 6 years in the Texas Air National Guard were up. That's 9 days out of 2 years while your fathers, sons, brothers, comrades-in-arms, uncles, and friends were dying in Vietnam. In 2 years (24 months), a "normal" ANG member would have attended twenty-four 2-day weekend drills and two 2-week summer encampments: a total of 68 days. Bush served 9, according to the records just released.

The records basically show that Bush did not attend required drills for the final two years of his ANG service: guilty as charged. He had been ordered to attend "nine certain duty days in person during Summer Camp at Ellington AFB between May 22 and June 7." THOSE ARE THE 9 DAYS THE WHITE HOUSE HAS JUST UNEARTHED. THAT'S 9 DAYS OUT OF 2 YEARS. Apparently he did not serve at all - for 2 years - except for 9 days during one 2-week period.

President Bush was prematurely discharged from the Texas ANG on October 1, 1973 (the guys in the rice paddies should have been so lucky) to attend Harvard. BASICALLY, THE FACT REMAINS THAT, BETWEEN MAY 1972 AND OCTOBER 1, 1973, BUSH WAS ABSENT WITHOUT PERMISSION. THIS WOULD HAVE CONSTITUTED AWOL IF ANYONE NOTICED AND CARED. Senator Kerry and the Democrats have been generous in limiting claims of shirking to only the year between May 1972 and May 1973.


(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brainwashed_youth Donating Member (640 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. excellent article my friend
but it kinda makes me wonder, did the White House even review this before they released it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ouch...i wonder wha the spin on this will be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. heard a bit of spin on this yesterday
it was mentioned in passing by a GOPer...

GOPer said that at the time bush* "served" the record keeping was a mess, so it wouldn't be unusual for inaccuracies in the documents or for some documents to be lost...

It's the National Guards Fault.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-11-04 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. If anyone knows how to put a spin on something,
it's a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm SO enjoying this
The tide is turning, folks. *'s critical mass of lies got too heavy and it's payback time. Let's stay on them!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Let's not get too excited.
You're giving the general public a lot of credit here. These are the same people who STILL think, in rather large numbers, that WMDs were not only found, but were USED against our troops. They see a headline and that's all they read. So a lot of people see that proof was offered, and that's all they care about. It will be our job to get this message to the people and literally spoon feed it to them. Otherwise, they will not eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mixxster Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Exactly.
Just take a look at the responses underneath the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. On with it but don't stop here: on with Harken, et al, on with every
crucial issue in his past that was glossed over or ignored in 2000. A war president can take the heat and knows where the buck stops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Stay on the story
The best people to spread this information are our vets. I'd love to hear my brother say, "While Bush was serving his 9 days, I was in Viet Nam earning a Silver Star...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is an excellent article, my question is, will the mainstream
media pick up on this and continue to investigate or will they just be lazy and only report on what was handed them.

I didn't see the WH press conference today, but I saw some reports posted on DU. Hopefully that is an indication this is far from over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hell, ths is easy...
"NINE DAYS IN TWO YEARS!" "NINE DAYS IN TWO YEARS!"

Makes a nice sign, an excellent chant... you name it! The Chimp's a-goin' down if this gets hammered hard enough.

Ah... this beats the Nixon tapes. I feel much better today.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rainbowreflect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Isn't that about the same percentage of time he's spent in
the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Ooooooooo!
LOL!!! Very perceptive, Rainbow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. HA HA HA, Rainbow! Perfect!
That dumbass has no idea of what it means to work, does he??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-10-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. * had the equivalent of a political patronage "no-show" job.
Wise-ass.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC