Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A battle for the soul of the Democratic Party.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:42 PM
Original message
A battle for the soul of the Democratic Party.
Author James Ridgeway's op-ed in The Guardian America analyzes differences in style in speeches by Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy; the real issue is philosophical differences between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Ridgeway frames this as "a catfight for the soul of the Democratic Party"

While they may appear to differ only slightly in their positions on most issues, the contrast between Obama and Clinton nonetheless reaches far beyond matters of style, hype, or rhetoric. What these two candidates offer is two vastly different visions of what it means - and will mean - to be a Democrat.

The next few paragraphs outlined the "meat" of Clinton's speech, an appeal to pragmatism and middle-class self-interest.

It was just this sort of well-informed pragmatism, of course, that guided the New Democrats of the Democratic Leadership Council. This centre-right clubhouse jettisoned the old-style liberalism of the New Deal and the 1960s civil rights movement and war on poverty, which linked the party's policies - at least in spirit - to some sort of larger quest for social justice. Bill Clinton and the DLC put an end to such visions in the 1990s as they triangulated their way toward a new agenda for the party, arguing for tax breaks for the middle classes, and welfare "reform" and more prisons for the poor. Up with the soccer mom; down with the welfare mother.

<snip>

Across town at the National Hispanic Cultural Center, Ted Kennedy was bringing a very different message to the crowd of about 200 that packed into and overflowed the small room. For him, Obama's emotional appeal as an agent of change, a harbinger of youthful energy and idealism arrayed against the grinding forces of the status quo, were nothing but an asset - in fact, they were the very point of his campaign. While Bill Clinton harks back to the 1990s as the model for the future, Kennedy of course recalls the 1960s, the era of his brothers John and Bobby - something that seems to attract voters not yet born at the time, who are embracing the septuagenarian Kennedy. "It's like when Tony Bennett suddenly became hip again after the kids discovered him," Bill Carrick, a Democratic strategist and former Kennedy aide, told the New York Times.

<snip>

Whether Obama proves worthy of the idealism that has coalesced around him is something that remains to be seen. But the finale to Kennedy's speech also emphasised the movement his campaign has created. Obama, he said, is inspiring a generation that "said they were not interested in the public life of the nation", and we need to have them involved to meet the challenges of our time. "We can't afford to have people young or old, black or white, straight or gay, any individuals left out. We need to have all of that together to bring about the change. There is one person, there is one individual, there is one candidate who has the ability to bring about that enthusiasm, that idealism, that commitment, that kind of spirit, that kind of vision for our country and the world, and his name is Barack Obama. And I'm here to ask, are you gonna help, can you stand change, are you gonna be with us for change."


http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/usa/2008/02/cat_fight_bill_and_ted_face_of.html

This article was originally published Feb 5, 2008. It's still relevant as we move nearer to, what may be the final showdown between Clinton and Obama. Even if Barack Obama comes out the winner Tuesday, this battle for the soul of the Democratic Party is going to go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Pubs push this shit...they want us Dems to destroy/weaken ourselves
without weakening themselves....clever....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. if you mean they push the DLC, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. IMO political parties that don't demand fairly strict conformity to their party platform do not have
a soul.

As Will Rogers said "I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadAsHell Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-02-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Zieg Heil!
Yeah, that's exactly the kind of party we need...NOT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rch35 Donating Member (658 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. That isn't what he's suggesting, even if it kind of sounds like it...
What he seems to be suggesting, to me at least, is that parties should serve the function that they do in most Parliamentary systems, like Italy and Germany, rather than in America and Britain (even though they are parliamentary, they have a two party system like us due to their methods of election). In countries like Germany and Italy, parties have much more focused goals and so that there is no need to have big tent parties, because of the way parties form political coalitions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-03-08 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. The following is part of Wes Clark's speech,
The Real State of the Union, delivered in January, 2006. It gives a partial list of his thoughts about his and the Dem party's outlook:

"We are a nation adrift, and America senses this.


Here's what we must do.


First, we've got to set things right at home. Protecting our Constitution comes first. Country before Party. Congress must fulfill its duties to the American people, not rollover for favors from the Executive branch. We need a full, in-depth, bipartisan investigation of the Administration's bypassing of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.


Congress needs to show resolve that the laws it passes do bind the executive branch, whether in wiretapping, humane treatment of prisoners, or the freedom of information act. Moreover, it is time for a special prosecutor, independent of the Department of Justice, to be empowered to investigate the Abramoff scandal, and pursue the leads all the way through Congress and up to the highest office in the land, if necessary. Get it out and get it over.


Then, we have to focus on the principal challenge ahead: preparing our nation to succeed in a 21st Century world where capital and technology flows instantly across borders, where the labor market is global, and where the benefits and security Americans have taken for granted are put at risk as supergiant countries like China, with 1.3 billion people, grab resources, spur their own economic growth, redress old grievances, and naturally pursue their own interests.


Today, we are indisputably the world's most powerful nation, but how we organize and prepare America at home, and provide leadership abroad, in the face of China's growing power, is the real and enduring challenge that 21st Century America must answer.


Can we protect that which we value, welcome and profit from China's growth, maintain our own security, and avoid the conflict and war which has so often accompanied historical changes such as we will witness? I believe we can, if we see clearly what must be done and bend our will to do it.


It begins at home, for this is where the most intractable problems lie, with public education, health care, and creating a business environment that encourages innovation, growth, and the creation of meaningful valued jobs.


-In education, we should be offering public preschool across America, encouraging renewed study of mathematics, sciences and engineering, and reform and change must be deep and fundamental creating the community programs needed to assure that every American child graduates from high school.


We must commit more resources to public education — not pull them away with voucher programs - but the most important resources are not financial — they are the commitment of community leaders to create public schools emphasizing learning and character, and the commitment of parents to work with their children, to assure they are fully engaged in the classroom and at home in preparing for their own productive future.


We need to reward teachers for their skills and commitments, but the best form of teacher accountability is not found in standardized testing but in the dialogue between teachers and parents centered on the love and respect for each child in the class. And no student who seeks to go to college should be denied that opportunity because they can't pay.


-In health care, we need to take better advantage of modern technology to practice evidence-based medicine, in which treatments and practices are based on statistically proven results — not commercial advertising — and doctors and hospitals are held accountable for their performance, not just by the threat of malpractice but by the day-to-day quality of their results.


We need to harness the innovation of our biotech, pharmaceutical, and health insurance industries better to serve the public good, not just the private gain of shareholders. No child in America should grow up without regular medical check-ups and care — or regular exercise and physical fitness - and every adult should be provided access to the kinds of diagnostic testing and preventive treatments which can slow the onset of aging diseases like diabetes, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer's. Additional insurance coverage should be directed to catastrophic illness and injuries, the kind that wreck families and shatter productive lives.


And inevitably this will mean transitioning over time from a work place centered, private payer system toward greater reliance on some form of single-payer system to ease administrative burdens and reduce costs.


-In the business community, we must spur research, development, and innovation, and the growth of the small companies that provide the majority of US employment. This will mean more private-public partnerships in developing new technology, and in linking our universities to business enterprises, as well as an expanded arsenal of economic and tax incentive programs aimed primarily at small businesses.


We must assure investments in the technology infrastructure — the broadband and wireless access improved and modernized highway, air, and rail transportation systems, and the access to affordable, reliable sustainable energy essential to continuing economic development.


We must have a real plan to achieve "energy independence."


And we need to do so without further damaging our fragile environment.


In fact, sustainable energy and so-called green engineering provide major growth opportunities for American ingenuity, and we must move in that direction.


We must chart a new path for labor in America, and probably for the union movement itself.


While workers still need help in redressing grievances against management, perhaps the old dividing lines make less sense in an age of high technology, social and geographic mobility, and global competition.


Is it possible that unions could become the "development agencies" for workers, protecting their rights, but also promoting their training, education and career development throughout a lifetime of many different skills and jobs? And if they don't who will.


For we know that in today's economy learning is a lifetime process and every American in the workplace must take increasing responsibility for his or her own development of skills, pursuit of opportunities, and creation of financial security for the family.


-And to address these and many other issues, our government will need more resources, for the great discovery of twentieth century America was not that we should get "government off our backs" but that government's could be a partner in the economy -in infrastructure, in regulation, in research and development, in education, and in health — laying the foundation for the achievements of private industry. In particular, we need resources to empower our people, with new programs comparable to the landmark contributions of the Homestead Act, the GI Bill, and the 30 year Mortgage in order to give every child in America a head start in education, business, home ownership, investment, and economic opportunity.


But we must raise resources in a way that protects the most needy and working families, and that still provides opportunities for the creation of the wealth that is the hallmarks of the American dream.


America's great strengths are our economy and the spirit of our people."

http://securingamerica.com/node/560

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Great post!
Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC