Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:38 AM
Original message
The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges...
---

While the mainstream media focuses on if his wife should have "stood by her man" at the press briefing, rambles on incessintly about how much the hooker charged, and shows the hooker pictures and look into her life ...meanwhile...

---


The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked

By Greg Palast
March 14th, 2008

While New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was paying an ‘escort’ $4,300 in a hotel room in Washington, just down the road, George Bush’s new Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Ben Bernanke, was secretly handing over $200 billion in a tryst with mortgage bank industry speculators.

Both acts were wanton, wicked and lewd. But there’s a BIG difference. The Governor was using his own checkbook. Bush’s man Bernanke was using ours.

This week, Bernanke’s Fed, for the first time in its history, loaned a selected coterie of banks one-fifth of a trillion dollars to guarantee these banks’ mortgage-backed junk bonds. The deluge of public loot was an eye-popping windfall to the very banking predators who have brought two million families to the brink of foreclosure.

Up until Wednesday, there was one single, lonely politician who stood in the way of this creepy little assignation at the bankers’ bordello: Eliot Spitzer.

MORE:
http://www.gregpalast.com/elliot-spitzer-gets-nailed/#more-1979

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now we know the reason he got caught.
Way to go FBI. But the crooks are all in the banking and mortgage industry. In the Republican party and in the White House. I wish the FBI was in the business of protecting us and not the crooks in the Finance business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh they were gunning for him all right. And they knew their target.
Weak, amoral, no loyalty to his family, party, or position.

Spitzer deserves what he got and more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Absolutely.
I've had about all I can take of this "poor Spitzer" argument. Every Democrat, particularly the outspoken ones, have to be aware that they will be targeted by the right. Aren't we also constantly on the lookout for Republicans participating in criminal and scandalous activities? Pity if we aren't as aggressive.

If Spitzer had kept his dick dry, he wouldn't be in this mess. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-14-08 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Too bad mainstream media won't tell the whole story
Edited on Fri Mar-14-08 10:07 AM by realFedUp
snippet...

"A note on “Prosecutorial Indiscretion.”

Back in the day when I was an investigator of racketeers for government, the federal prosecutor I was assisting was deciding whether to launch a case based on his negotiations for airtime with 60 Minutes. I’m not allowed to tell you the prosecutor’s name, but I want to mention he was recently seen shouting, “Florida is Rudi country! Florida is Rudi country!”

Not all crimes lead to federal bust or even public exposure. It’s up to something called “prosecutorial discretion.”

Funny thing, this ‘discretion.’ For example, Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, paid Washington DC prostitutes to put him diapers (ewww!), yet the Senator was not exposed by the US prosecutors busting the pimp-ring that pampered him.
Naming and shaming and ruining Spitzer – rarely done in these cases - was made at the ‘discretion’ of Bush’s Justice Department.

Or maybe we should say, 'indiscretion.'

from http://www.gregpalast.com/elliot-spitzer-gets-nailed/#more-1979


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC