Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Patrick Cockburn: This is the war that started with lies, and continues with lie after lie after lie

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-21-08 10:08 PM
Original message
Patrick Cockburn: This is the war that started with lies, and continues with lie after lie after lie
from the Independent UK:



Patrick Cockburn: This is the war that started with lies, and continues with lie after lie after lie
Wednesday, 19 March 2008


It has been a war of lies from the start. All governments lie in wartime but American and British propaganda in Iraq over the past five years has been more untruthful than in any conflict since the First World War.

The outcome has been an official picture of Iraq akin to fantasy and an inability to learn from mistakes because of a refusal to admit that any occurred. Yet the war began with just such a mistake. Five years ago, on the evening of 19 March 2003, President George Bush appeared on American television to say that military action had started against Iraq.

This was a veiled reference to an attempt to kill Saddam Hussein by dropping four 2,000lb bombs and firing 40 cruise missiles at a place called al-Dura farm in south Baghdad, where the Iraqi leader was supposedly hiding in a bunker. There was no bunker. The only casualties were one civilian killed and 14 wounded, including nine women and a child.

On 7 April, the US Ai r Force dropped four more massive bombs on a house where Saddam was said to have been sighted in Baghdad. "I think we did get Saddam Hussein," said the US Vice President, Dick Cheney. "He was seen being dug out of the rubble and wasn't able to breathe."

Saddam was unharmed, probably because he had never been there, but 18 Iraqi civilians were dead. One US military leader defended the attacks, claiming they showed "US resolve and capabilities".

Mr Cheney was back in Baghdad this week, five years later almost to the day, to announce that there has been "phenomenal" improvements in Iraqi security. Within hours, a woman suicide bomber blew herself up in the Shia holy city of Kerbala, killing at least 40 and wounding 50 people. Often it is difficult to know where the self-deception ends and the deliberate mendacity begins. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/patrick-cockburn-this-is-the-war-that-started-with-lies-and-continues-with-lie-after-lie-after-lie-797788.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. marmar
marmar

When you have been lying for 8 year, you have to stick to the "lying" all the way to the finish line... The start of the Iraq war was a lie, the whole affair was a big fat lie

And now, they have just to start lying for the the next year or so, and then them are "Home free" they believe..

It is pondering that many american are reading English news paper, to get information about the state of affair in your own country. When will the american public, who doesn't read English, news paper, og have no access to the internet know the truth?.. When the news paper are working overtime to get the story right, after mr Bush are out of office.. It looks like the only way the american public would know the truth from all the lie, are when mr Bush, mr Cheney and the rest of this administration are out of office.. Because then the american news paper, who once was one of the greatest power in this world, would possible start to act as that they once was. The correction to the misuse of governance.. Maybe they even get mr Cheney and mr Bush put into prison with all the Revelations about what have been happened for 8 year?

Diclotican

Sorry my bad English, not my native language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. There is nothing wrong with your English, Diclotican....
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-22-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. marmar
marmar

Thank you. Are using the Check spelling often, to get it right :toast: It is a gentle information that I am not a English speaking person. Was meet with the "grammar police" first time I was here to write, so it is a little information.

Hope you, and your family, and all here at DU have a good easter;)

Diclotican

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC