Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News Channel on the Run

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:16 PM
Original message
Fox News Channel on the Run
TIME: Commentary
Fox on the Run
Thursday, Mar. 27, 2008
By JAMES PONIEWOZIK

....Fox hasn't gone soft, but from watching its coverage lately, I get a sense that the haven for conservative hosts, and viewers alienated by liberal news, needs to figure out its next act. Fox News is not simply a mouthpiece for the Bush White House: it rose with Bush after 2000 and 9/11, was played on TVs in his White House and reflected the same surety and flag-lapel-pin confidence in its tone and star-spangled look. It was not just a hit; it was the network of the moment.

Now, with two Democrats locked in what seems like a general-election campaign and lame-duck Bush fading from the headlines, it has to figure out how not to seem like yesterday's news. At times recently, the network has appeared uncertain about its focus. Its primary-night coverage has felt staid and listless. Sometimes it has gone tabloid with celebrity-news, true-crime and scandal stories (WEBSITES POSTING SEXY PICS LIFTED FROM FACEBOOK). At other times it has retreated into a kind of war-on-terrorism news-talgia, playing up threatening chatter and new missives from al-Qaeda leaders while its rivals are doing the election 24/7; flipping to Fox can feel like time-traveling to 2002.

Fox is still the top-rated news channel, but there are signs it's plateauing. Its ratings started to lag in 2006, and in February, CNN's prime time (boosted by several presidential debates) beat Fox among 25-to-54-year-olds for the first time since 2001. (CNN and TIME are owned by Time Warner.) Maybe even more galling, the network has lately faded in the ephemeral category of buzz. MSNBC - with far fewer viewers -- has been the political-media obsession of the 2008 primary, largely because of feuds between the Clinton campaign and the network for its perceived pro-Obama bias.

Ratings shmatings: if a Rupert Murdoch network cannot dominate the field of ticking off the Clintons, that has to sting....

***

As it wades through the fin de régime, Fox News will have one important asset: its loyal viewer base. But even for them, it will need to shake up its comfortable Bush-era routine, perhaps by cultivating new hosts, perhaps by taking a page from McCain and branding itself as the channel of maverick authenticity, not of establishment dogma. The viewers are Fox's to keep. It just has to figure out what's going to make them mad starting in 2009.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725955,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. And that means.. SELL News Corp stock!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. They've already started. My sister and brother in law take in a steady diet of
Faux news watching, and they've already told me that Obama is an anti-semite who secretly supports Farrakan. I'm sure this is the meme over at Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. The viewers are dying daily. It has the elderly demographic, somewhere
between McCain and Murdock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
selador Donating Member (706 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. note that
CNN's relative increase in share has coincided with their listing rightwards, to an extent.

so, i am not sure i buy the analysis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. The best thing for fixed noise's business
would be a hillary clinton presidency. You know they have hours of footage stored up of every clinton fuckup of the 90's. They got rich during the impeachment era by trashing the clintons 24/7. Why would they not want that to happen again.

Murdoch really has no ideology - he just wants to have more money than god. And another clinton in the white house is worth billions to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. House of Saud and Kingdom Holdings are big investors in NewsCorp.
Remember that, fellow ditto-head lurkers, when you're watching the Fox propaganda take on the ME. You're getting the views that Saudi Arabia wants you to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Years ago, and I'm not kidding, older people began watching
FOX because the "crawl" was larger and slower, easier to read...in the reality of things, that how FOX got it's "base".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Interesting! I had an elderly relative who was pretty much confined to home...
and watched it just because it was more entertaining for someone who watched a lot of TV in the daytime -- I think for some of the reasons the article indicates people watch Fox, aside from politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Most people like "background noise", be it a TV, radio...
whatever. I worked in a nursing hoome where FOX was the channel du jour for various reasons, but most residents didn't pay it much mind, until something "important" came up. Oddly, the further Right the channel moved, the less people listened to it; and the 24 cycle of inane rambings on things that were not newsworthy, like an earthquake or a hurricane, generally were just dusted away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-28-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. A right-wing white House rag lamenting the decline of a right-wing White House
blow torch. Boo-fucking-hoo. All of these media types had better head for the hills before the revolution starts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC