Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hard to celebrate all these lost jobs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 07:37 AM
Original message
Hard to celebrate all these lost jobs
Published: 4/2/2008 12:14 AM

The article in the March 23 business section, "Business without borders," was stunning in its poor timing and insensitivity. I felt the article like a slap in the face.

Newscasts have been filled with stories of people being terribly hurt financially in these horrible economic times.

Tens of thousands of people losing their homes and jobs. I then open the paper to read this celebration of outsourcing.

The article seemed to suggest that we should congratulate Affinity Express, an Elgin business that has grown to over 800 employees. I hesitate to even call it an Elgin business since only 15 (2 percent) of its 800 employees work locally.

Only 100 are in the United States. The rest are in India. The company plans to add another 250 employees this year, in the Philippines.

Thanks to outsourcing, the India economy is booming. Partly because of companies like this one, we are losing jobs at an alarming rate. They benefit from tax breaks that encourage the outsourcing of jobs we desperately need right here at home.

It's ironic that the ads this company produces will try and sell us products we can no longer afford to buy..

I lost my job last year when it was outsourced to, you guessed it, India.

My industry? We used to produce elementary school text books. That's right. A huge number of the textbooks your children will be reading are produced in India.

NAFTA has been a colossal mistake. When it began, I was hopeful that we would be able to have free and fair trade with the rest of the world.

Everyone seems to benefit except the American employee, if you're lucky enough to actually be employed.

I have developed my own way of handling the companies who contact me from overseas.

I tell them politely, but firmly, that I will not accept their phone calls until they call me from the United States.

Most of the time they can't understand what I've said since it's not on their cheat sheet of American phrases.

http://www.dailyherald.com/story/?id=164331&src=
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Any American company
that receives property tax breaks, government grants or contracts, or any other form of government subsidy that its paid for with our tax dollars,

and outsources jobs to other countries,

should lose all such subsidies and contracts immediately, and in some cases be required to repay the government -- including back property taxes to local governments.


I want this to become law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-02-08 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not only outsourcing, but also importing employees
The major problem I have with Hillary is her position on increasing the number of H-1(b) work visas issued each year. This brings in foreign workers to take the jobs here that Americans do want. Many of these are IT professionals taking well paying jobs.
This influx of foreign born IT professionals seems to have started with the Y2K myth and has exploded since then.

Way back when Bush said we have created x,000 new jobs, how many were filled by these foreign employees? Last month, there was a report that the country had lost 63,000 jobs. With the agressive marketing by the H-1(b) staffing companies, their employees are the last to go.

Many of our government contract jobs are staffed with work-visa employees. Last week when the news came out that contract employees had been fired for looking into the candidates' confidential pasport information I was wondering if they were H-1(b) workers or Americans. Was it just curiosity or was it espionage? It wouldn't be too difficult for spies to infiltrate through this guest worker program and some information, as we saw with this pasport data, is accessable without a security clearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC